Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Samantha Morgan-Price

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Samantha Morgan-Price

  • Postcode verified

    E2 9HE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−31Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositivestronglyeffectivelyconsistentlyclearly
Criticismnot consistentlypoornot alwaysweakerpersistently absentvariablenot yetslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings756w−38
  • What needs to improve95w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
849
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
18%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Ms Julia Burns The Headteacher Mowlem Primary School Mowlem Street Bishops Way Bethnal Green London E2 9HE

p.1

Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 23 March 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Could you please convey my thanks to the Chair of the Governing Body, the local authority’s Head of Achievement Birth to 11, and the pupils and staff I spoke to during the inspection.

p.1

Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 28 and 29 September 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made

p.1

Primary School

satisfactory progress in making improvements.

p.1

Primary School

satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Primary School

In 2010, attainment improved compared to the previous year and pupils demonstrated stronger progress in their learning. Pupils’ attainment increased significantly in mathematics and the proportion of pupils who gained Level 5 in this key subject rose to an above-average position. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities attained as well as other pupils. In lessons seen, the pupils made varying levels of progress. Data indicate that Year 6 pupils are on track to achieve Tribal 1-4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 123 6001 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email :rebecca.jackson@tribalgroup.com their attainment targets this year, which are lower than 2010 although sufficiently challenging. Attainment in writing is being addressed throughout the school and pupils are making better gains in their writing in most year groups especially Year 4.

p.1

Primary School

In lessons seen, pupils worked well in pairs and in groups, making good use of the opportunity to extend their learning through focused discussions. These opportunities are having a sound impact on developing pupils’ speaking and writing skills.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school is satisfactory and sometimes good. Pupils welcome the initiatives to improve behaviour in the playground which is having a positive effect on reducing poor behaviour.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils’ attendance is average and the school is making good efforts to reduce the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent.

p.2

Primary School

Teachers are using opportunities well to develop pupils’ oracy skills. In the stronger lessons, teachers injected good pace into pupils’ learning activities. Practical activities featured strongly in many lessons. For example, pupils developed their writing skills from their investigation of local amenities and services in their community. Some pupils say they have more opportunities to speed read and develop their writing. In some lessons, teachers assessed pupils’ progress quickly, enabling them to move on well in their tasks. One good example was seen where the teacher and a teaching assistant modelled a piece of descriptive writing which allowed pupils to effectively build on their understanding and application of connectives and adjectives. Pupils are informally setted by ability in subjects, although this does not always result in more able pupils being challenged as well. Some marked work seen was of a good quality that clearly identified how well pupils

p.2

Primary School

were achieving. However, the quality of marked work is variable and teachers are not consistently identifying what pupils need to do to improve their work.

p.2

Primary School

Actions to improve the quality of teaching have resulted in some improvement. The proportion of good lessons has risen slightly and plans are in place to improve weaker teaching. Teaching is not yet consistently good. Leaders are assessing the quality of lessons regularly. However, action points to improve individual teachers’ practice are not monitored effectively. In addition, they are not time bound and therefore improvements are slow. Action plans identify the key priorities and include specific timeframes for improvements to pupils’ outcomes. The headteacher has a satisfactory understanding of the progress that has been made against these action points. However, the multiple action plans make it difficult for school leaders to have a complete overview of the full impact of the actions taken. The key responsibilities and accountabilities of other senior leaders are unclear, and this is hindering the rate

p.2

Primary School

at which school actions are progressing.

p.2

Primary School

The local authority is providing good support for the school to improve teaching and to build capacity at senior leadership level. I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took

 Improve teaching so that it is consistently good by the end of the academic year through:  ensuring that teachers make good use of assessment information to set work at the correct level, matching the ability of all the pupils  making sure that pupils understand, through explanation, feedback and marking what they are expected to do to succeed in and improve their work.  Improve the rigour of planning and monitoring by ensuring that school development plan targets are specific and measurable. This is to be completed by the end of December 2009

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion