Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Margaret Shepherd

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Shepherd

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinggood progresseffectivevery wellenjoyconfidentindependentvery high
Criticisminconsistentinconsistenciesnot consistentlybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,125
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mrs J Chevaugeon Headteacher Blyth Horton Grange Primary School Kitty Brewster Blyth Northumberland NE24 4RE

p.1

Grange Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 29 March 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the Interim Executive Board and pupils for meeting with me.

p.1

Grange Primary School

Since the previous inspection, the school has completed its transition from a first school into a primary school. The current Year 6 pupils are the first cohort to have gone right through the school. There has been an increase in staffing and many staff changes, including senior and middle managers.

p.1

Grange Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 7 and 8 December 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Grange Primary School

The outstanding leadership of the headteacher and the Interim Executive Board identified in the previous inspection has been sustained. The senior leadership team is now more effective because the staff, who had only just taken up their roles at the time of the previous inspection, have become established and valuable members of the team. The team is now very well coordinated with a very clear sense of purpose and a determination to raise attainment and increase progress. The thorough induction processes have ensured that new members of staff have settled quickly. All these features are building on the capacity to improve at a faster rate.

p.1

Grange Primary School

The refinement of data analysis in reading, writing and mathematics is more efficient. The breakdown to show each year groups’ progress, which includes analysis of overall progress half termly as well as that of more- and less-able pupils, is working well, as are the progress meetings based on the analysis that pinpoints individual pupils’ slower rates of progress. January 2011

p.1

Grange Primary School

Page2 This analysis shows that progress remains inconsistent across different subjects and year groups but there is an increasing proportion of good and some outstanding progress of more-able pupils in Years 2, 4 and 6. The 2010 national assessments in Key Stage 1 show a rise in attainment in all subjects, although it remains below average. The school did not have a Year 6 cohort in 2010 so there were no national assessments at the end of Key Stage 2. The inspection confirms the better rates of progress through the school. In all lessons, there is more-careful planning of different tasks in group work to match pupils’ needs. In the best teaching, the expectations of more-able pupils are very high and pupils enjoy rising to the challenge and reaching their goals. In some lessons teachers do not check the more-able pupils’ work regularly enough to check that they are building on previous learning, which reduces their rate of progress.

p.2

Grange Primary School

The school has made outstanding progress in providing guidance for pupils to help them improve. All lessons begin with an outline of self-evaluation indicators for good or outstanding progress and teachers regularly refer to them. Pupils are very confident in identifying their own progress and justifying their evaluation. Pupils also have a very good understanding of which sub-level of the National Curriculum they are working at and enjoy responding to teachers’ comments in their written work.

p.2

Grange Primary School

There has been a thorough programme of training for teaching assistants. The reallocation of their responsibilities and the extension of their hours to include time for dialogue with teachers are contributing to making them more effective in supporting pupils. The inspection identified variations in the quality of this support, but it is at least satisfactory and there are some outstanding features.

p.2

Grange Primary School

There has been mixed progress with the areas for development in the Early Years Foundation Stage issues. It has been better in the Nursery than in Reception. In both age groups there is now a much better range of outdoor and indoor activities with a good balance across different areas of learning. Children are now more confident in choosing independent activities and concentrate well on their tasks. There are inconsistencies in the quality of whole-class or group sessions across the unit. In the best sessions, the content is interesting and matches the children’s needs and interests well, for example, making silly soup from logs, dogs and frogs to extend awareness of rhyme. In other sessions, teachers do not provide enough guidance to children at the beginning of independent learning sessions to identify the challenges of the different learning opportunities. At the end of some sessions there is not enough feedback given to individual children about the progress they

p.2

Grange Primary School

have made, nor is enough time given for them to talk about their learning. The quality of interaction between adults and individual children varies. In the best, the adults use questioning skilfully to extend children’s learning, particularly in using language for thinking and communicating. In the least-successful interactions, adults dominate the activity and the use of questioning is restricted. There are now clear routines for all children and they are more independent and move between the different parts of the unit confidently. The new system of children choosing their own time for taking a snack is an improvement on the previous organisation. Assessment routines are developing but are not used consistently enough to focus on children’s specific needs in planning. January 2011

p.2

Grange Primary School

Page3 The local authority continues to support the school well with several consultants working regularly in the school. The partnership with the school from a neighbouring authority is particularly beneficial. The extension of links with the special school that has just moved to the adjacent site is working well.

p.3

Grange Primary School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

December 2009

 Raise pupils’ attainment by:- - ensuring that the work provided for the most able and the least able pupils is accurately matched to their ability and provides sufficient challenge - ensuring that pupils are given well-targeted guidance which helps them to improve and are given opportunities to act on the guidance provided - improving the skills of the teaching assistants.

p.4

December 2009

 Improve the provision made for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage by:- - ensuring that the activities provided for children help them to make progress - establishing routines which help children gain independent learning skills.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion