Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Nye

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Nye

  • Postcode verified

    WR14 4HF

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallyoutstandingstrongconsistentlyexcellenteffectivehigh expectationspositive
Criticismnot alwaysmissednot yetnot consistentlylowernot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings705w+80
  • Leadership105w+25
  • What needs to improve101w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
897
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr K Clough Headteacher Malvern Wells C of E Primary School 263 Wells Road Malvern WR14 4HF

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 8 March 2011 to look at work in English. I particularly appreciated the welcome that you gave my colleague, Ann Henderson HMI, during this inspection.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is good.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 has been consistently well above average, especially in 2010 when every pupil achieved the expected level and the large majority attained the higher level. Exceptionally high standards in reading and speaking and listening are evident throughout Key Stage 2, and although standards in writing are slightly lower, they are still above that expected for their age. Pupils make outstanding progress in reading throughout the key stage. In writing, learning and progress are good. The school is, nevertheless, working successfully to raise standards further in writing, in particular through ensuring higher standards in handwriting.  In Key Stage 1, pupils’ attainment in reading is exceptionally high with consistently well above average outcomes at the end of Year 2. Standards in speaking and listening are also outstanding. In writing, attainment is consistently above average although this has dipped slightly in recent

p.1

Achievement in English

years.  Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills in communication, language and literacy that are above those expected for their age. They make good progress in all aspects of communication, language and literacy, especially in writing. By the time they transfer to Key Stage 1, many pupils exceed expected levels in these areas.  There are no underperforming groups and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make outstanding progress relative to their starting points. In the current year, the higher proportion of pupils in this group are on track to meet or exceed their challenging targets. This is because their needs are met through the provision of highly personalised and effective support.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 The teaching observed was never less than good. Teachers make good use of assessment data to plan their lessons so that activities meet the wide ranging ages and abilities of the pupils. Teachers have high expectations to which pupils eagerly aspire.  Relationships between adults and pupils are excellent and pupils have exceptionally positive and mature attitudes towards their learning. The pace of lessons is brisk and carefully differentiated questioning is used well to assess pupils’ understanding and reinforce learning, although opportunities are occasionally missed to challenge pupils even further. Pupils are confident in their responses and throughout the school their speaking and listening skills are a strength.  Teachers have good subject knowledge, especially with regard to the teaching of phonics. Teaching assistants are well trained and provide consistently good support to both teaching and pupils’ learning.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

Information and communication technology (ICT) and classroom resources are used well to support and reinforce new learning.  Pupils’ work is accurately marked with detailed and helpful guidance. However, the best practice in following up how well pupils address the issues raised in marking is not yet consistently applied throughout the school. As a result, pupils are not always aware of when they have achieved their targets.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The curriculum is well planned to ensure that it is broad, balanced and meets the wide-ranging needs and interests of all the pupils. The school is starting to review and update the English curriculum and policy to ensure that the currently strong structure which is based on skills progression is enhanced by a greater emphasis on creativity. Newly introduced strategies, such as ‘Big Write,’ are staring to have a positive impact on improving writing. The teaching of phonics is well established. Reading and writing cover a wide range of genres, with a strong emphasis on opportunities for extended writing.  ICT is used very well to support both teaching and learning and the newly introduced learning platform is enhancing homework for older pupils and helping parents to become even more involved in their children’s learning. Cross-curricular links are strong, such as in history where the study of evacuees is covered effectively through a range of reading and written

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

work connected with Nina Bawden’s book, Carrie’s War. Curriculum enrichment opportunities are good, for example through theatre trips and regular performances, mainly linked to festivals.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

Leadership and management in English are good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 Although a number of recent adjustments have been made to the leadership and management of English, senior leaders and managers have a very clear and accurate understanding of the strengths and areas for development and share a common commitment to high standards and driving improvement. This is because effective systems are in place to monitor pupils’ learning and track their progress, and these lead to challenging but achievable targets. Although strategic planning has a clear focus on raising attainment further in writing, it is not always made clear how success will be measured against outcomes for pupils.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 updating curriculum plans and policies to ensure that recently introduced strategies to improve writing are fully embedded  ensuring that the existing good practice, in following up how well pupils respond to marking, extends fully throughout the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion