Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Frater

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Frater

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
123
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

What needs to improve 25%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 1 March 2011 as part of our survey of the use of nurture groups for pupils who are vulnerable to underachieving.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

 Sharps Copse is a nurturing school where all members of staff, including administrators and the site manager, contribute to pupils’ social development.  Positive relationships underpin the work of the school and help to develop pupils’ confidence and self-esteem.  Home-school liaison is particularly strong and parents and carers value highly the parenting courses provided for them by the nurture group staff.  The nurture group is part of a broad package of support and intervention, including mentoring. Good procedures for identifying individual needs, including effective use of tools such as the Boxall profile and emotional literacy checklists, ensure that pupils receive appropriate provision.  Nurture group staff model the expected behaviour well.  Pupils’ progress is monitored in detail through meetings with key staff each term. The meetings are informed by a range of assessments including National Curriculum levels and attendance data.

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

 The school’s monitoring of data indicates that the nurture group is effective in improving pupils’ attitudes to learning, and their attendance Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

Ms C Koerner Headteacher Sharps Copse Primary School Prospect Lane Havant Hampshire PO0 5PE and behaviour. Progress in reading, writing and mathematics is limited because pupils miss most of the literacy and numeracy lessons while attending the nurture group.  The school attributes the significant improvement in pupils’ behaviour to the work of its nurture group.  Parents and carers value highly the nurture group provision and attribute its success to the one-to-one attention given to each child.  The local authority provides effective training and support for nurture group staff, including staff in the community improvement partnership of schools.

p.1

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 accelerating pupils’ progress further by:  ensuring that pupils do not miss out on developing literacy and numeracy skills, particularly when they are in the nurture group for extended periods of time  using the Boxall profile to set targets more systematically for individual pupils in the nurture group and monitoring and evaluating pupils’ progress towards their targets and using the information to inform lesson planning.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion