Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Apr 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wilf Hudson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Wilf Hudson

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 3DQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivevery highhigh-qualityexcellentvery effectiveclearlyenthusiasm

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings607w+93
  • What needs to improve70w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
662
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms K Passant Principal Runshaw College Langdale Road Leyland Lancashire PR25 3DQ

p.1

improving science in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit between 14 and 16 March 2011 as part of our survey in science.

p.1

improving science in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to a national report. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributors or contributing institutions but individuals and institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

improving science in colleges

The evidence base included: meetings with students, teachers and technical staff and managers; observation of six lessons; analysis of documentation and students’ work; and a tour of the science department.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Effective teaching and learning in science are characterised by detailed planning. A wide range of activities in lessons is supported by good resources. Staff use humour and enthusiasm well to enliven their lessons. Very strong working relationships between staff and students are clearly valued by students. There is a good balance of stretch and challenge in lessons. Students are learning well and making at least good and often better progress in lessons. Teachers use questions well to check learning and to stimulate debate and discussion among students. Students work well with their peers in small groups and pairs. Natural questioning from students is used well by teachers to extend discussions and help understanding. Accurate assessment of students’ work generally gives clear feedback on how to raise their standards. The focus on examination techniques is unobtrusive, but relentless, where appropriate.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Standards of students’ work and success are very high. Retention rates, pass rates and value-added scores are high across almost all science subjects and courses.  Most science students progress to continue studying science at a wide range of universities.  The recruitment to science is very high and rising.  Leadership and management are very effective. This is exemplified by the high-quality team work that creates the effective teaching and learning approaches observed and the jointly devised and shared resources. Staff provide help and support to each other. Ultimately, this leads to the high standards of students’ work and success.  The technical support for science subjects is excellent. Laboratories are well used by large numbers of students and are well maintained and set up for practical work. The technical staff are full members of the science team and make a very strong contribution to the work in science.

p.2

Features of good practice

 Well-qualified staff are carefully selected and recruited. Staff are well supported in their development through appropriate performance reviews and continuing professional development to keep up to date and extend their teaching expertise.  There are clear, open and accurate approaches to self-assessment. This is especially strong in the evaluation of the standards of teaching and learning which focuses clearly on learning. Lesson observations during the inspection confirmed the college’s analysis of the quality of teaching and learning.  Students value the experiences they have in science. They are clearly enthused by their teachers in lessons and respond well to the teaching they receive.  An extensive enrichment programme for science students is helping them to raise their sights and reach for careers they may not have expected to enter. Students are very appreciative of the enrichment opportunities they

p.2

Features of good practice

are offered.  There is high-quality additional support for students, both in terms of carefully planned tutorial programmes and additional subject help when needed.  A very good range of science courses, including GCE AS and A level, vocational science, Access and foundation degree programmes is available.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 devising and implementing effective strategies to raise success rates on the GCSE science programme to their previously high level.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science provision. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to the relevant funding bodies and will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion