Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Marianne Young
- Postcode verified
KT3 3HN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 34
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs B Mitchell Headteacher Christ Church C of E School Elm Road New Malden Surrey KT3 3HN
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: music
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 24 January 2011 to look at work in music and particularly the impact of singing and instrumental work as well as the ‘Wider Opportunities’ initiative, supported through the standards fund.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: music
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: music
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with you, staff, pupils and the School Improvement Partner; scrutiny of relevant documentation; and observations of Key Stage 1 and Year 3 music lessons. Individual instrumental lessons, recorder rehearsals and an assembly for Key Stage 2 pupils were also observed.
p.1
Features of good practice
Throughout the school, pupils sing with enthusiasm and enjoyment. They demonstrate good intonation and expression. Words are clear and their singing is characterised especially by using a good range of dynamics. Older pupils in the choir sing successfully from memory, and are able to hold individual parts accurately both when singing unaccompanied and when accompanied by the orchestra and the piano. The school choir performs regularly in school and at external venues. In addition to promoting an appreciation of singing, these activities do much to enhance the school’s standing and prestige within the community. Pupils spoke with great enthusiasm, not only of their own pride in performing but also of hearing others play their instruments. One pupil summed up the thoughts of the group when they said ‘It’s nice to see our friends playing and we had no idea that some people could play instruments’. Standards are clearly above average in instrumental playing, singing and
p.1
Features of good practice
also in classroom work. The musical skills that pupils learn when singing are successfully transferred to whole-class music lessons. This was evident when Year 3 pupils performed individual rhythmic patterns against a clearly defined pulse producing a balanced group performance where different patterns linked together effectively. Several staff are involved in leading music activities. As a result, a number of ensembles, involving both boys and girls, meet regularly at both the infant and junior sites. You described how your teachers have benefited from taking part in the whole-class ‘Wider Opportunities’ instrumental teaching programme. Staff have shared teaching of these lessons with teachers from the music service which has raised their confidence and improved their musical skills. In spite of this positive work, you recognised that you do not, at present, monitor the numbers of pupils who continue learning instruments as a result of being involved
p.2
Features of good practice
in whole-class teaching. The classroom music curriculum is planned well, and good use is made of different published materials which are adapted to meet the needs of all pupils. Regular assessment of pupils’ progress is made through a variety of mechanisms and this information is shared with pupils to help them identify what they need to do to improve. Nevertheless, this assessment practice is not evident in the whole-class instrumental lessons and is an area for future development.
p.2
Areas for further development
As we discussed, provision in the school could be further improved by:
p.2
Areas for further development
monitoring and evaluating the number of pupils continuing with instrumental lessons following their involvement in the wider opportunities programme ensuring that the good assessment practice featured in class lessons is also used in the wider opportunities lessons.
p.2
Areas for further development
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop music in the school.
p.2
Areas for further development
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion