Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christine Inkster

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christine Inkster

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisegood progresseffectivelystrongsuccessfullyrigorouspositiveenjoyimproved
Criticismlimitedyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1298w+86
  • What needs to improve138w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,422
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mrs J Sutton Headteacher Newport Primary School St Paul's Road Middlesbrough North Yorkshire TS1 5NQ

p.1

School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 9 March 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussion and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please also pass on my thanks to pupils, staff, the Chair of the Governing Body and the representative from the local authority whom I met during the day.

p.1

School

Since the last inspection a new deputy headteacher has been appointed and there are currently two long-term supply teachers working in the school.

p.1

School

As a result of the inspection on 30 November and 1 December 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

School

The school has responded positively to the issues identified at its previous inspection. The headteacher and deputy headteacher work closely as a team, are committed to making improvements and have high aspirations for both staff and pupils. They have taken a structured, measured and rigorous approach to making improvements and have ensured that each new strategy is fully embedded before introducing the next stage. They fully analyse and evaluate the impact of the work done to ensure it is effective before taking the next steps. This has ensured that the strategies implemented provide very firm foundations on which to build. They have introduced rigorous systems for collecting and analysing data on pupils’ progress which enables them to identify precisely which pupils need additional challenge or support. All staff are now held accountable for the progress of pupils through regular pupils' progress meetings and through the monitoring and evaluation of strategies to

p.1

School

support particular groups of pupils in their learning. As a result, the rates of progress for groups of pupils are increasing. January 2011

p.1

School

Page2 The school’s own data, evidence seen in lessons and in pupils’ work show that the rates of progress made by more-able pupils are increasing in most classes, although less so in classes where there has been some staffing turbulence. Senior leaders have identified exactly which more-able pupils were not making sufficient progress in reading, writing and mathematics and have taken positive steps to improve this. Staff are now working more effectively as a team and because of high quality modelling of teaching, particularly by the deputy headteacher, this has shown that all pupils can achieve more. As a result, teachers have higher expectations of what more-able pupils can achieve and pupils are keen to achieve their very best. More-able pupils said their work is challenging and they find their lessons more enjoyable and fun. They fully understand their curricular targets and find marking now helps them to improve their work. In the whole-class sessions observed, some

p.2

School

challenging questions were directed at more-able pupils and tasks provided for groups, pairs and individuals were more closely matched to the pupils’ abilities.

p.2

School

Pupils now have very positive attitudes to learning and discussions with them showed that they thoroughly enjoy extending their learning, for example, through using computers to do further research or when they are inspired to do extra work at home to study topics in more depth. The rate of progress of all pupils, including more-able pupils is increasing because the quality of teaching is improving. Assessment is used more effectively to plan work which closely meets pupils’ needs, class timetables have been re-organised to provide more time to focus on the development of basic skills and the pace of learning has increased. While questioning skills have improved, there is still more work to be done to ensure that even more high order questions are used to challenge pupils’ thinking further.

p.2

School

The curriculum is more stimulating and interesting for pupils. There has been a strong focus on developing basic skills particularly in learning letters and sounds (phonics), spelling, handwriting and basic numeracy skills. This has enabled pupils to gain more confidence in applying their literacy and numeracy skills in other subjects and provided firm foundations for further learning. While the curriculum is still being developed to provide more creativity and a clear progression for pupils to develop key skills, pupils were able to give examples of where they have successfully used their numeracy skills in science lessons and literacy skills. Although pupils said they enjoy writing, some felt that opportunities for writing at length were more limited and this was borne out by the writing seen in pupils’ books. Senior leaders have already identified this as a ‘next step’ in their curriculum development. In

p.2

School

lessons seen, pupils were excited and enthusiastic about their learning. For example, one pupil in Year 1 who started the school with little or no English spoke at length about his passionate interest in discovering about ‘the earth’, showed the inspector a variety of books and shared his in-depth knowledge about this topic. Pupils in Year 1 enjoyed some exciting topic work on space travel and thoroughly enjoyed making torches using electrical circuits while others developed their reading skills through activities in the outdoor area. Older pupils enthused about their work on the Ancient Egyptians and Ancient Greeks and others showed the depth of their creativity when describing the ‘worlds’ they had created from their own imaginations. January 2011

p.2

School

Page3 The senior leadership team has grown to include phase leaders and the roles of subject leaders are being distributed and developed as staff gain more confidence in sharing their expertise with others. Subject leaders are beginning to be involved in monitoring and evaluating the work in their subjects, for example, through scrutiny of planning and pupils’ work, although senior leaders acknowledge there is still further work to be done in this area.

p.3

School

Teaching and the curriculum in the Early Years Foundation Stage have improved markedly. In lessons seen, staff were consistently using questions to promote children’s learning and to develop their speaking and listening skills. Staff listened carefully to children’s contributions and responded appropriately to move them on in their learning. The Early Years Foundation Stage leader demonstrated the use of higher-order questioning skills but this has yet to be developed across the whole team. There was a strong focus on developing children’s problem solving, reasoning and numeracy skills both indoors and outdoors, particularly for nursery-aged children, for example, counting the pieces of treasure in the sand. Children chose to use computers and the interactive whiteboards to engage in problem-solving activities, taking turns and sharing the equipment. The range of activities outdoors has been successfully extended to match those indoors. Children were fully

p.3

School

engaged in working in the ‘garage’ which was an activity that arose from their own interests. They had visited a local garage and were using their basic skills in numeracy to measure and count tyres and their early literacy skills to write notes and make records of their work. Speaking and listening skills were successfully promoted through using the telephone and dealing with their ‘customers’ who required their car to be mended or their petrol tanks to be filled. This is enabling children to make more progress and assessments show that the rates of progress have increased since the last inspection for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.3

School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

 Increase the progress of more-able pupils, by:

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

- raising teachers’ expectations of these pupils - providing a higher level of challenge in whole-class discussions and in group tasks - providing a curriculum that consistently matches the higher levels of the National Curriculum.

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

 Provide a more stimulating curriculum, by:

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

- extending the role of middle managers in developing their subjects - linking the newly implemented curriculum more closely to the development of skills, particularly literacy and numeracy.

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

 Make the teaching and curriculum in the Early Years Foundation Stage more consistent, by:

p.4

The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took place

- using questions more effectively and responding more closely to children’s contributions - providing an appropriate curriculum at the right level for nursery-aged children to develop their problem solving, reasoning and numeracy skills - extending the outdoor learning to match the range of activities indoors.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion