Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Harrett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Harrett

  • Postcode verified

    B71 1RP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progressexcellentskilfullyrapid progressoutstandingimprovingconfidentlyenjoy
Criticismnot yetnot sufficientlyinconsistentnot alwaysnot enthusiasticnot consistentnot effectivelylower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings508w+49
  • Leadership96w+69
  • What needs to improve148w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
733
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Willetts Headteacher St Mary Magdalene Junior and Infant School Stanway Road West Bromwich B71 1RP

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 15 February 2011 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in English

 By the end of Year 6, attainment is broadly average and stronger in speaking and listening and reading than in writing. Pupils make satisfactory progress in their learning overall and good progress in speaking and listening.  The proportion of pupils reaching Level 5 in National Curriculum tests in Year 6 has risen, with many of these pupils making good progress in their learning. Pupils of average and lower ability make satisfactory progress.  Behaviour is excellent. Pupils are well motivated and show commitment, interest and engagement in their work. They speak confidently and enthusiastically about their reading.  Some pupils enjoy writing but, generally, they are not so enthusiastic about this aspect of their work.

p.1

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 The three lessons observed were good. However, the quality of teaching overall is not yet sufficiently consistent or sustained over time to promote securely good progress.  In the best practice, lessons are well paced, purposeful and the pupils rapidly become absorbed in their learning. In these lessons, teachers and their assistants skilfully monitor the progress made by individuals to ensure that all are on track.  Pupils are becoming used to writing longer texts through initiatives designed to provide them with the techniques to do so. This has improved their vocabulary and paragraphing. However, questioning techniques do not sufficiently challenge the pupils to use more complex sentence structures in their speech and writing.  Recent improvements in assessment provide pupils with a clearer view of what they have achieved and how to improve their work. Teachers have an accurate understanding of the pupils’ attainment. In some classes,

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

pupils are involved well in the assessment process on a daily basis. In the very best practice, this regularly informs lesson planning. However, this is inconsistent across the school.  Teaching assistants are well deployed, providing support for pupils so that all groups make satisfactory progress, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. However, extensive levels of support are not always balanced effectively enough by opportunities for these pupils to work independently and so make even more rapid progress.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The curriculum is significantly strengthened by a wide range of trips which provides opportunities for improving all aspects of the subject. Trips to Stratford-upon-Avon and whole-school outings to such places as Weston- super-Mare provide pupils with rich experiences which are skilfully used as the basis for improving reading and writing. These activities, and visits to the school by poets, are highly valued by the pupils.  The curriculum is broad and flexible, meets requirements, and provides opportunities for a full range of activities. However, whereas some teachers are very skilled at modifying their planning to meet the particular needs of their pupils, this is not yet consistent across the school.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

Leadership and management in English are good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 Leaders have developed good systems for monitoring and evaluating provision and outcomes with a cycle of lesson observations, scrutiny of planning and evaluation of written work in exercise books. There is a shared and accurate understanding of the subject’s strengths and areas for development.  Leaders communicate a clear ambition and determination to raise standards. The school is developing sound strategies for sharing the good and occasionally outstanding practice in teaching and learning across the school. The overall quality of teaching and the accuracy of assessment are improving.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 using assessment information on a regular basis to modify lesson planning to meet the current needs of all pupils in lessons  ensuring that the support that enables pupils to make satisfactory progress is matched by providing them with the opportunity to undertake tasks independently and so improve their ability to make sustained good progress in their learning  using a range of questioning techniques to encourage pupils to extend their thinking and express themselves in complex and well-structured sentences in their speaking and writing.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion