Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Stephen Abbott
- Postcode verified
HD1 4ES
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at Greenhead College. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- A copy of this letter will be sent to the Skills Funding Agency. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 109
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr M Rostron Principal Greenhead College Greenhead Road Huddersfield HD1 4ES Dear Mr Rostron
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 good/best practice study: mathematics
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 10 and 11 February 2011 to look at your work in mathematics.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 good/best practice study: mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 good/best practice study: mathematics
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of students’ work and relevant documents; and observation of five lessons.
p.1
Features of good practice
Mathematics and further mathematics are highly successful advanced-level subjects at the college. A very large majority of students gain grades A* to B in their GCE AS and A2 examinations; progression to higher education is very good. The department promotes its Year 13 AS further mathematics course well to students who plan to read highly mathematical subjects at university. This is partly in response to the feedback it obtains from past students. There will be scope to promote the full A level in further mathematics more strongly if accommodation issues can be resolved. Students have positive attitudes to learning mathematics. They appreciate the extensive range of support available. Many take advantage of the ‘maths help’ sessions, offered nine times a week, where staff volunteers and student mentors provide support to any student who needs it. Students also make good use of the mathematics section of the college
p.1
Features of good practice
virtual learning environment, both for support and for enrichment. Greenhead College benefits from a large team of experienced and effective teachers, who demonstrate excellent knowledge of mathematics and the requirements of the GCE examinations. The departmental schemes of work include links to appropriate resources, including practical and discussion-based activities. The team has developed packs of notes on each topic that are issued to students and referred to in many lessons. All the teaching observed was good or better. Lessons are well structured, with a development phase where students are introduced to new ideas, and a consolidation phase, where they work on exercises under supervision. As they do so, teachers circulate effectively to check on students’ progress, addressing any misconceptions or difficulties that arise. Sometimes students are given a passive role during the development
p.1
Features of good practice
phase, with most of the ideas coming from the teacher and one or two students who volunteer contributions. Students respond well when they are given an active role in their learning. For example, in an outstanding lesson on numerical solutions of equations, students sketched graphs on their mini-whiteboards and made trial calculations to help them understand iterative methods. Their exploratory work helped them to appreciate the usefulness of such methods, and why they sometimes fail. The mathematics area provides a vibrant, if sometimes cramped, learning environment. Posters and other displays are used well to promote mathematics. Students are offered good guidance on wider reading and relevant careers and their learning is enriched through mathematics competitions and visits to universities. The most able students are supported well to prepare themselves for Oxbridge entry. The mathematics department is very well led, with close attention to
p.2
Features of good practice
detail. Self-evaluation is very thorough, with close analysis of results for different groups, and regular student questionnaires. Appropriate action is taken where issues arise. Very good systems monitor students’ progress and ensure consistently good teaching. The head of department actively promotes the sharing of ideas and resources. The mathematics team is constantly seeking improvement.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
increasing the proportion of lessons where students are given an active role in developing new ideas increasing participation in A-level further mathematics.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics at Greenhead College.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to the Skills Funding Agency.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion