Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Mann

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Mann

  • Postcode verified

    CV37 9XD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+37Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivelyproudeffectivestrengthssecureclearaccurate
Criticismweaknessesmissedyet tolow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings611w+48
  • Leadership99w−25
  • What needs to improve101w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
798
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Burrows Headteacher Wilmcote CofE (Voluntary Aided) Primary School Church Road Wilmcote Stratford-upon-Avon CV37 9XD

p.1

technology (D&T)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 8 February 2011 to look at work in D&T.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons and a review of D&T-related activities within other subjects.

p.1

technology (D&T)

The overall effectiveness of D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

Pupils’ achievement in D&T is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in D&T

 Children start to develop their skills in D&T-related activities in the Early Years Foundation Stage from a low level. Activities are planned appropriately to ensure that progress is made in using simple tools such as scissors to cut materials such as paper and card. Pupils in Key Stage 1 steadily build on previous skills and gain an understanding of the importance of investigation and research when designing a simple puppet. Progressively more difficult units of work ensure that older pupils demonstrate a good understanding of the key processes of research, planning, designing and making by the end of Key Stage 2.  Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes towards D&T and are very proud of the products that they make. They find learning fun and see the relevance of D&T to future experiences and adult life. This is because they learn how to use simple tools, such as saws and glue guns, safely. Furthermore, they

p.1

Achievement in D&T

are developing a good awareness of how to keep healthy. Pupils demonstrate good personal and social skills when working in small groups to undertake investigations and practical activities.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

The quality of teaching of D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

 Some good practice was observed and teachers demonstrated secure subject knowledge across the school. Lessons were planned carefully and managed to develop pupils’ skills in D&T well. Questions were used appropriately to check levels of understanding. Resources were used well: teachers’ use of visual aids to illustrate key teaching points supported pupils’ learning.  Teachers and support staff provide good support and guidance for pupils in lessons. This is especially so for those pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities, those from the Traveller community and those who speak English as an additional language.  Effective use is made of end-of-unit assessments to measure the progress of pupils and inform yearly reports to parents. Marking of pupils’ work is satisfactory overall but best where teachers provide guidance in pupils D&T journals to help them improve their next piece of work. However, the

p.2

Quality of teaching of D&T

use of journals is not standard practice across the school. Consequently, opportunities are missed to support good assessment and improve outcomes in literacy by encouraging pupils to write reflectively and at length in their evaluations.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

The quality of the curriculum in D&T is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in D&T

 The curriculum is broad and balanced with some good features in the range of extra-curricular activities available and strengthening links with a local secondary school and college. Units of work from the national scheme of work help to provide an appropriate foundation for the progressive development of pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding in D&T. The school is modifying these units effectively to develop a curriculum that is integrated and tailored to meet the needs of a diverse school community. This is a positive step forward.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

Leadership and management in D&T are satisfactory.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in D&T

 The subject coordinator demonstrates a clear vision for the development of D&T and this is reflected in an appropriate subject action plan for improvement. A well-organised portfolio of evidence related to pupils’ achievements in D&T provides an accurate picture of the subject’s strengths and weaknesses. A range of school-based monitoring activities provides the subject coordinator with oversight of provision in D&T. Pupils’ performance in D&T is monitored appropriately but information gained from all of these monitoring activities is yet to be used with precision and rigour to further raise pupils’ outcomes.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 increasing the range of opportunities for pupils to write at length in D&T  ensuring that self-evaluation is used effectively to fully:  monitor the quality of provision  identify areas for further improvement to raise pupils’ outcomes.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop D&T in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion