Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Harrett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Harrett

  • Postcode verified

    NW6 5ST

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+95Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingpositivelyskilfullysuccessfullyeffectivelysuccessfulimproving
Criticismnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings517w+93
  • Leadership125w+80
  • What needs to improve134w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
762
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 15%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr A Reilly Headteacher St Mary’s RC Primary School Canterbury Road London NW6 5ST

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 17 and 18 February 2011 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Children enter the school with skills well below those expected for their age. Pupils of all abilities, including those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, make excellent progress in their learning, reaching standards that are above average by the time that they leave in Year 6. Careful attention to the needs of all pupils, including those at an early stage of learning English, ensures that all groups of pupils do well. Attainment is higher in reading than in writing, but the gap has narrowed significantly in recent years.  Although the pupils make excellent progress overall, their rate of improvement is faster in Key Stage 2 than in Key Stage 1.  Pupils’ behaviour in English lessons is outstanding. They respond very positively to the range of activities in lessons. They take pride in their work and speak about it enthusiastically, eager to share their knowledge and their pleasure in learning.

p.1

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 Lessons are prepared well so that the pupils are very clear about what they are learning. Teachers skilfully ensure that tasks have a clear purpose and audience so that pupils are well motivated and engaged in their learning. Teachers have successfully focused on improving writing skills, particularly at Key Stage 2. Pupils respond positively to the challenge of regularly writing at length.  Teachers skilfully ensure that speaking, listening, reading and writing are well integrated in lessons. Teaching assistants work closely with class teachers, ensuring that all pupils are enabled to make at least good progress in their learning. Teachers are well supported by colleagues who work closely and well with pupils and their families whose circumstances are likely to make them vulnerable.  Assessment in lessons is good, enabling teachers to modify work to suit the needs of individuals. However, marking in exercise books does not

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

sufficiently inform pupils precisely what they have achieved, nor does it specify the next steps that they should take to improve their work.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The curriculum is carefully designed to promote improvement in all aspects of English. Pupils respond very positively to the imaginatively designed themes and topics that skilfully capture their interest and improve their skills and knowledge so that they make excellent progress in all aspects of their learning.  Subjects are linked well so that literacy is promoted effectively across the curriculum, such as in religious education. Consequently, there are many carefully planned and effective opportunities across the curriculum for pupils of all abilities to apply and improve their skills in English.  Schemes of work are carefully planned to provide interest and to promote achievement well across the full range of reading, speaking and listening and writing activities.  Pupils speak very enthusiastically about the trips and visits that they make to theatres and museums and the input of visitors to the school, such as

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

Leadership and management in English are outstanding.  Excellent team work between senior and middle leaders has led to significant improvements in attainment and progress in recent years. All those with responsibilities in this area work together regularly and effectively. The notable success in raising achievement in writing, and of sustaining it in reading and speaking and listening, is a direct result of the team’s relentless drive and ambition to provide the pupils with the best possible education in English.  Leaders regularly monitor and accurately evaluate work in English, leading to successful initiatives to raise achievement. They have rightly and successfully focused on improving achievement in Key Stage 2 and acknowledge that they have not yet had such an impact in Key Stage 1.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the quality of marking across the school by ensuring that it states precisely what has been achieved and specifies clearly the next steps that pupils should take to improve their work  ensuring that pupils make better progress in Key Stage 1 by implementing initiatives that have been successful at Key Stage 2 in the younger year groups and focusing on Key Stage 1 more emphatically in monitoring and planning.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion