Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Michael McIlroy
- Postcode verified
E4 6RE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the leadership of the federation. p.3
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 908
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ms L Cousins Headteacher Wellington Primary School 21 Wellington Avenue Chingford E4 6RE
p.1
than one school
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 20 and 21 January 2011 to look at the leadership of the federation.
p.1
than one school
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
than one school
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with senior leaders, middle leaders, governors, staff, parents, local authority representatives, and pupils, and the scrutiny of relevant documentation.
p.1
than one school
The effectiveness of the federation leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement is satisfactory.
p.1
Context
College Gardens Nursery School and Wellington Primary School federated in 2006. In 2007, the nursery school moved into the building it now shares with the primary school and the new Ridgeway Park Children Centre which also became part of the federation. Originally, the federation was lead jointly by the headteachers of both schools. Following staffing changes, the headteacher of the primary school was appointed recently to lead the federation. At the time of the inspection, the local authority had approved the amalgamation of the two schools.
p.1
Outcomes
Children make good progress in College Gardens Nursery School and their attainment is broadly average by the time they leave. However, weaknesses exist in children’s communication, literacy and language skills. Pupils make satisfactory progress at Wellington Primary School. Standards at Key Stage 1 are below average. In 2008 and 2009, the most recent years for which validated data are available, attainment in mathematics and English at Key Stage 2 was broadly average. Nonetheless, there is a steady trend of improvement, particularly at Key Stage 1. Attendance is just below average in Wellington Primary School. The federation has introduced a number of useful measures to improve attendance but the impact of these has yet to be seen. Behaviour is good in both schools, as are the attitudes to learning of children and pupils. This reflects the positive ethos that exists across the federation.
p.2
Provision
The quality of teaching is improving across the federation, as a result of recent initiatives in Wellington Primary School on teaching and learning. Some effective steps have been taken to spread good practice in teaching by moving some staff between schools. Planning in the joint Early Years Foundation Stage has been improved by the effective work of the Early Years Foundation Stage manager who works across both schools. A number of useful steps have been taken recently to enrich the curriculum in both schools, such as the introduction of Black History Month and Multilingual Month. The skills of some staff in one school have been used well to deliver the latter initiative in the other. Good links between the Nursery and Reception classes mean that children can sing and listen to stories together and that work in phonics can be more closely matched to children’s abilities. The care, guidance and support that children and pupils receive have been
p.2
Provision
particularly strengthened by federation. Transition arrangements for children have benefited from the recent relocation of Reception classrooms so that they are close to the Nursery school. Both schools make good use of the Children’s Centre to support parents and vulnerable children and pupils.
p.2
Leadership and management
Until recently, the impact of federation has been limited, as both schools have largely operated separately. Nonetheless, potential barriers to federation, such as extensive building work, initial parental concerns and discontinuity in staffing, have been handled well. Close teamwork between the new leader of the federation and the acting headteacher of the Nursery school and Children’s Centre is providing increasingly clear direction and a stronger sense of common purpose for the federation. This is reflected in the high morale of staff. The links between the schools have focused chiefly on the Early Years Foundation Stage. Its leader has ensured good liaison between the Nursery and Reception classes and improved assessment procedures so that children’s progress is recorded more accurately. The roles of other middle leaders are underdeveloped across the federation as staff have had few opportunities to work in the partner school.
p.2
Leadership and management
The monitoring of teaching and learning draws too heavily on support from the local authority’s improvement services. The federation’s evaluation of its effectiveness is generally accurate. Its development plan is detailed but does not focus sharply enough on how the federation as a whole can be developed. Relationships with parents are good. Their views are sampled and they consider federation leaders to be open and approachable. Communication with parents about the work of the federation is satisfactory. Although each school’s newsletter mentions activities taking place in the other settings, there is scope to use them to promote the federation’s profile more strongly.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
developing the roles of middle leaders across the federation and providing more opportunities for staff to work in the partner school sharpening development planning so that planned improvements cover both schools strengthening arrangements for the monitoring of teaching.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the leadership of the federation.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion