Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tom Grieveson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Grieveson

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfulstronggood progressconsistentlysuccessfullyeffectiverigorousstrengths
Criticismpersistent absencelowexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings456w+33
  • Leadership307w+84
  • What needs to improve78w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
828
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 37%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

than one school

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 9 February 2011 to look at the leadership of the federation. Please pass on my thanks to the staff, governors and local authority representatives who gave up their time and made a valuable contribution to the visit.

p.1

than one school

The visit provided important information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual schools will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

than one school

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff, governors and local authority representatives; a scrutiny of relevant documentation; and the analysis of students’ performance information.

p.1

than one school

The effectiveness of the federation’s leadership and management in embedding ambition and driving improvement is good.

p.1

Context

The Brook Learning Partnership consists of Rivington and Blackrod High School and Ladybridge High School. The schools were federated in September 2004 as a collaborative restart. This followed the closure of The Deane School and the opening of Ladybridge. The schools are separated by a distance of seven miles. Substantive headteachers were appointed to both schools in 2007 following the retirement of the federation’s executive headteacher. After several months of careful deliberation, governors will decide whether to continue with the federation at a meeting in March 2011. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Context

Mr A Purcell Headteacher Rivington and Blackrod High School Rivington Lane Horwich Bolton BL6 7RU Mrs H D'Arcy Headteacher Ladybridge High School New York Junction Road Deane BL3 4NG

p.1

Outcomes

 Standards in both schools have been rising consistently since 2007 with the large majority of students making satisfactory or good progress given their starting points. Students’ targets are suitably challenging and expectations of their capabilities are high.  Attendance continues to improve in both schools as the rate of persistent absence declines. Students’ good behaviour was acknowledged in the most recent inspections of both schools. Fixed-term exclusions are low and there have been no recent permanent exclusions in either school.

p.2

Provision

 The initial support provided to Ladybridge following federation in 2004 was successful in stabilising the school and this provided a platform from which sustainable capacity could be built. The school’s successful removal from special measures in 2006 reflects the outcomes of this work.  Cross-federation work has been to the benefit of both schools. Over time, as the capacity of Ladybridge has developed, there has been an increasing emphasis on sharing good practice. This has ensured that the federation has become a genuine partnership of equals. Trust and confidence between staff are key features of the relationship which exists between the schools.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Together with senior staff and governors you provide clear direction for your schools and the federation. Both schools demonstrate high ambition and the expectations of staff and student performance are challenging.  Since 2004, the federation’s leadership structures have provided significant additional experiences and opportunities for those in senior and middle leadership positions. This has added greatly to their expertise and has been significant in retaining staff and raising standards.  Governors and senior leaders are perceptive in their analysis of the federation’s development. They recognise the period from 2004 to 2007 as a time of successful stabilisation at Ladybridge which involved a significant change to the school’s personnel and a re-defining of its aims and values. The decision by governors in 2007 to change strategy by appointing separate headteachers to each school has proved decisive in sustaining

p.2

Leadership and management

improvement. It has enabled both schools to build successfully on early federation work while continuing to take advantage of federation-wide opportunities.  The retention of strong collaborative practices in areas such as data analysis, and through the work of the executive business team, has ensured an efficient use of resources and provides effective support to staff and governors. In addition, the federation’s strategy for site management has resulted in considerable financial savings.  Self-evaluation processes are rigorous and routine. Senior leaders and governors demonstrate an accurate understanding of each school’s performance. Carefully constructed individual improvement plans reflect school priorities well and offer a strong basis for continued development.  The initial strategic aims of the federation, to establish a successful and self-sustaining school at Ladybridge, have been achieved. Decisions about

p.2

Leadership and management

the federation’s future are to be made next month. Governors and senior staff are keen to build on the strengths and benefits of current arrangements and take these forward into broader collaborative activities in the West Bolton area.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 no areas for improvement have been identified ahead of the governing body’s forthcoming decision about the future of the federation.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the leadership of the federation.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion