Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Maureen York
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop this aspect of the school’s work. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 83
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and children, during my visit with John Kennedy HMI on 10 February 2011 as part of our survey of the use of nurture groups for pupils who are vulnerable to underachieving.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups
This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.
p.1
Strengths of the nurture group provision
Senior leaders have a clear vision for the work of the nurture group as part of the whole-school approach to inclusion. They understand that the provision of a nurture group alone will not meet all the pupils’ needs. Hence, the nurture group is just one element of a comprehensive range of additional provision that reflects the school’s emphasis on early intervention. This provision is coordinated effectively and this helps to avoid duplication and to ensure consistency. The purpose of the nurture group is to help pupils with their learning by providing support for their emotional and social development. As a result, the Sunflower classroom provides a warm and supportive environment and the staff are effective role models for pupils’ behaviour and relationships. The pupils respond well to the quiet firmness and kindness which typifies the well-established daily routine. This provides a calming influence and
p.1
Strengths of the nurture group provision
helps to develop pupils’ self-confidence and supports them in their learning. Pupils who have been part of the Sunflower class in the past remember it as a ‘happy place’ where they had help. For one it means that ‘I am good now’ while for another it ‘helped with my writing’. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Strengths of the nurture group provision
Ms H Eley Headteacher Ruskin Infant School Ruskin Avenue Wellingborough Northamptonshire NN8 3EG Parents and the wider school staff understand the role of the nurture group and this helps to foster effective partnerships both in school and externally. Crucially, the pupils attending nurture group also spend each morning or afternoon with their home class. This means that there are regular opportunities to work in their class and to develop relationships with their peers. In addition, good communication across the school helps to ensure that approaches with individual pupils are followed consistently and that the responsibility for their progress is shared between the class teacher and the nurture group staff. Monitoring and evaluation by senior leaders are rigorous and staff make notes in daily diaries on how well Sunflower pupils are doing socially and emotionally. The school’s data show that the majority of pupils make good
p.1
Strengths of the nurture group provision
progress in their personal, social and emotional development and that this is having a positive effect on their learning. Parents and carers are very enthusiastic about the provision in the nurture group and the impact that it is having, or has had in the past, on their children. One described it as ‘brilliant’. They feel well informed about their children's progress and feel welcomed into the nurture group environment.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
looking for ways to further involve parents, for example, using the observations that parents make on their children’s progress as part of the school’s evaluation evidence.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop this aspect of the school’s work.
p.2
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion