Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robert Ellis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robert Ellis

  • Postcode verified

    TN19 7PB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivesuccessfulclearaccuratesecure
Criticismgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings392w+64
  • What needs to improve104w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
483
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs Williams Headteacher Etchingham Church of England Primary School Burgh Hill Etchingham East Sussex TN19 7PB

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 15 October 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; discussions with senior leaders, other staff and pupils; and a telephone discussion with a representative from the local authority.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is good.

p.1

Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment

 Increased accuracy in teachers’ assessment and a clearer understanding of progression are making a positive contribution to raising attainment.  The development of suitable short-term targets that focus on pupils’ next small steps in learning is contributing to maintaining the pace of learning.

p.1

Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress

 APP is helping staff to devise and communicate clear success criteria and identify key questions to test pupils’ understanding.  Pupils have increasingly good opportunities to evaluate their own and others’ work.  The use of APP criteria for assessment and the effective monitoring of pupils’ progress are enabling teachers to identify and remedy gaps in pupils’ learning. Successful interventions are carried out at individual pupil and whole-school level.  APP is helping to focus support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who are gifted and talented. Tasks and activities are being closely tailored to the needs of these different groups.

p.1

support learning

 Accurate assessment ensures that teachers have a secure baseline from which future progress can be measured.  Teachers’ planning usefully identifies opportunities for assessment.  Marking in pupils’ books and oral feedback in lessons provide helpful comments that relate to pupils’ individual targets.  Pupils and teachers share an understanding of National Curriculum levels and they are developing a common vocabulary with which to discuss assessment.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 The curriculum is under review with the intention of matching it more closely to pupils’ needs and interests while providing a good range of assessment opportunities.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 providing parents with better information about their children’s individual targets and so enabling them to play a greater role in supporting learning  enabling pupils to take greater ownership of their targets and identifying how the work they are doing contributes to meeting their targets.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion