Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    SY4 2AW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 57% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery wellmake good progresswell plannedconfidentlyenthusiasticsafeconfident
Criticismnot alwaysnot yetnot rigorousbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings685w+57
  • Leadership74w0
  • What needs to improve125w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
861
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 14%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Cutcliffe Headteacher Weston Lullingfields Primary School Nr Baschurch Shrewsbury Shropshire SY4 2AW

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 15 November 2010 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of four lessons; and a tour of the school with pupils.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement

 The number of pupils in each cohort changes considerably from year to year, and is also affected by higher than average inward mobility. This impacts on the overall attainment on entry to the school, which varies annually from in line with national expectations to below national expectations for ICT.  Pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage are supported well. They confidently use basic technologies such as floor robots, walkie-talkies, headphones and the interactive whiteboard, so that by the time they enter Year 1, they are achieving the expected standard. The progress from Year 1 to Year 6 is good. By the end of Year 6, pupils leave with levels of attainment which are above average overall, especially in presenting information, communication and control.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress. They are given good support in lessons by well-informed teaching assistants.

p.1

Achievement

 Pupils behave well when using ICT equipment. They are enthusiastic about ICT and by Year 6 they can maturely discuss the opportunities they have to use new technologies in a range of subjects.  By Year 6, pupils have a good understanding of how to stay safe when using new technologies. This is further supported by regular visits by the school’s police liaison officer to discuss e-safety with pupils.

p.2

Quality of teaching

 Teachers and teaching assistants have good subject knowledge and are confident users of ICT.  Activities in lessons are generally challenging. Year 6 pupils confirm that they find ICT lessons ‘challenging but fun’. Younger pupils also enjoy ICT but the pace of lessons and challenge is not always rigorous because groups using ICT are, at times, too large and this prevents all pupils from becoming involved fully.  Teachers and teaching assistants use questions well to give immediate feedback and to move pupils forward in their next stage of learning. Year 5 and 6 pupils know the levels they are achieving in ICT and what they need to do to move up a level.  However, not all teachers share the learning objective and/or success criteria for ICT, so that pupils can be fully involved in assessing their progress within a lesson and over time.  The relationships between staff and pupils are excellent. Staff have good

p.2

Quality of teaching

behaviour management skills and ensure a safe environment in which pupils can learn.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum ensures that all pupils receive their statutory requirement for ICT. There is a good emphasis on presenting information, communication and control.  However, the use of data loggers is not planned as systematically. This has been recognised as an area for development and plans are in place to improve this aspect of the ICT as the new curriculum develops.  Although the Early Years Foundation Stage classroom does not have immediate access to the internet or an interactive whiteboard, this is resolved by the children being able to use these facilities in the main building, at least three times a week.  Well planned links are being made between ICT, literacy, numeracy and foundation subjects. The school is moving towards an integrated and creative curriculum but this is not yet fully embedded.  The daily after-school club is very well attended and provides pupils with the opportunity to use ICT to develop their skills, for research or for

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

The leadership and management of ICT are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of ICT

 Being a much smaller than average school, the leader for ICT is also responsible for leading and managing a range of other subjects. However, this has not reduced the focus on ICT, which has a high profile in the school.  Good links have been made with the local secondary school, which has ICT status, to help develop the curriculum and to provide technical support.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the learning objectives and/or success criteria for ICT lessons, or for ICT when supporting other subjects, are shared with pupils, so as to involve them more in self- and peer-evaluation  embedding and evaluating the use of ICT to support all subjects, as the creative curriculum develops  improving the curriculum for ICT by developing the use of data logging.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion