Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brenda McIntosh
- Postcode verified
S12 2AA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance5
“Relationships and behaviour management were positive features in all the lessons observed.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,181
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Julie Parry Headteacher Prince Edward Primary School City Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S12 2AA
p.1
Edward Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 30 September 2010, for the time you gave to our telephone discussion and the on-site preparation visit, and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please also pass on my thanks to the staff and pupils for taking time to talk to me.
p.1
Edward Primary School
There has been a high turnover of staff since the last inspection in June 2009. The deputy headteacher was seconded to the school from the local authority from September 2009. Some key permanent appointments have been made since Easter 2010. Among these include an assistant headteacher with responsibility for Key Stage 1, a Key Stage 2 coordinator, an Early Years Foundation Stage leader and a special educational needs coordinator. The school still does not have a substantive headteacher. The lead headteacher, appointed as an interim measure by the local authority just prior to the last inspection remains in post. The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals has risen significantly and is currently over 50%. More pupils who speak English as an additional language have joined the school.
p.1
Edward Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 16 and 17 June 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Edward Primary School
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com September 2010 Page 2 Attainment remains low at the end of both Key Stage 1 and 2 but it is improving. The outcomes for children in the Early Years Foundation Stage increased significantly in 2010 due to the improved provision. The percentage of children attaining the nationally expected levels for the end of Reception in personal, social and emotional development and communication, language and literacy improved from 17% in 2009 to 53% in 2010. There has been a steady improvement in
p.1
Edward Primary School
attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 in reading, writing and mathematics. The unvalidated test results for the end of Key Stage 2 in 2010 indicate improvement in reading and mathematics but a decline in writing. The results in writing were disappointing and pupils did not perform as well as the school expected them to in the writing test. As a result, the overall attainment in English was not as good as in the 2009 national tests but better than at the last inspection. However, the analysis of school data indicates that the cohort made better than expected progress from the end of Key Stage 1. The analysis of school data also indicates that pupils’ progress is accelerating across the school with substantial gains being made. As a result, there is an increase in the number of pupils attaining the standards expected for their age and achievement is improving.
p.2
Edward Primary School
Lesson observations during the inspection indicate that the quality of teaching is improving and agree with the school’s own evaluations. Pupils appreciate that a more stable staff team is bringing a better continuity to their learning. The move away from setting across the school means that teachers are more accountable for the progress of pupils in their classes. Pupils say, ‘This move has led to more time for learning and improvements in behaviour’. Staff are increasingly aware of the levels pupils are working at and are more confident in planning work which matches their ability. Some recent developments are having good effect on classroom practice and bringing an increased focus on learning. For example, learning objectives are now shared with pupils along with the success criteria for assessing how well pupils are doing. Relationships and behaviour management were positive features in all the lessons observed. In the best lessons teachers ensure learning
p.2
Edward Primary School
moves on at a good pace and questions are used well to challenge pupils’ thinking. In some lessons the pace of learning slows because teachers do not always circulate enough to ensure that those pupils working independently fully understand the task or make sufficient progress. The contribution from teaching assistants varies. Some provide effective support and move pupils’ learning on well but some provide too much direction which inhibits the development of independent learning skills. This also makes it difficult for the teachers to be able to assess pupils’ achievements accurately.
p.2
Edward Primary School
The quality of teachers’ marking has improved and is more consistent in providing the next steps in learning. This has been achieved by revisiting the policy and checking the marking through regular scrutiny of pupils’ books. Pupils spoken to during the inspection reported that, ‘Marking has improved big time, particularly in the way we have more time to respond to the teachers’ comments to improve our September 2010 Page 3 work’. Pupils are clearer about the levels they are working at and the next steps they need to take to move up a level.
p.2
Edward Primary School
The headteacher, supported by the deputy headteacher, has steered the school firmly through a period of significant turbulence in staffing. She continues to communicate a powerful sense of direction to staff and the drive for improvement. The school’s capacity to sustain improvements is being strengthened by other staff taking on leadership responsibilities. The increase in shared leadership across the school is contributing to the growing consistency in good teaching, pupils’ accelerating progress and the reduction in the number of pupils with persistent absence. Self-evaluation is accurate, as it was at the last inspection, and is increasingly robust. More staff are contributing to monitoring the school’s performance and increasing their effectiveness in evaluating and leading school improvement. Senior leaders use the detailed information about pupils’ progress more effectively to make teachers aware of the impact of their teaching. Pupil
p.3
Edward Primary School
progress meetings are more frequent and have increased the accountability of the teachers. The meetings result in consideration of what action is to be taken to meet the needs of individuals, especially those falling behind. The school has received effective support from the local authority and is mindful that it will need strategic support in securing a substantive headteacher and deputy headteacher.
p.3
Edward Primary School
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.3
place in June 2009
Increase the number of pupils reaching the nationally expected standards for their age. Move more teaching to a good quality, by developing teachers' understanding of how pupils learn in different subjects, so they plan more effectively to accelerate progress. Ensure pupils reflect and act on their teachers' guidance to help them move forward in their learning. Ensure new leaders and staff at all levels are effective in evaluating and leading the improvement of the school.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion