Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jan 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Green

  • Postcode verified

    UB2 4RP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 83% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisegood progresswell plannedwell-plannedenthusiasticsafepositivelysuccessfullyimproved
Criticismnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings542w+76
  • Leadership115w+33
  • What needs to improve124w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
763
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Beeden Headteacher Dairy Meadow Primary School Swift Road Southall Middlesex UB2 4RP

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 November 2010 to look at work in ICT.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of two lessons; and a tour of the school with pupils.

p.1

and communication technology (ICT)

The overall effectiveness of ICT is good.

p.1

Achievement in ICT

 Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with attainment which varies widely but is generally in line with expectations. Pupils’ progress is good and by the end of Year 6, they leave with levels of attainment which are above average, especially in presenting information, communication, and control and use of spreadsheets.  Overall, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities make the same good progress as their peers. However, this is not consistent throughout the school and depends on the quality of the support that they are given, especially by teaching assistants.  The relationships between staff and pupils are good. Pupils treat each other and adults with respect. They are enthusiastic about using ICT and, by Year 6, pupils discuss maturely the opportunities they have to use new technologies.  Pupils have a satisfactory knowledge and understanding of how to keep safe while using new technologies. Many spoke positively of the impact

p.1

Achievement in ICT

that a recent visit from a theatre group had on developing their awareness of e-safety. However, a number of pupils acknowledged that they do not transfer their knowledge and understanding of e-safety to their use of ICT at home.

p.2

Quality of teaching

 Teachers have good ICT knowledge and support pupils well. However, the subject knowledge of support staff varies. This is acknowledged as an area for development in the ICT development plan.  For two years ICT has been taught successfully by one teacher throughout the school. However, the evaluation of this approach showed that class teachers were becoming deskilled in teaching ICT. As a result, teachers are now teaching their own classes once again. They have embraced this well and are teaching the subject with confidence.  Assessment of pupils in lessons is good. Well-targeted questions are used by teachers to give immediate feedback and to move pupils forward to their next stage of learning.  Pupils have the opportunity to self-assess against clearly stated learning intentions.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The curriculum is broad and balanced, and well planned to ensure a progression of skills and coverage of the National Curriculum for ICT. However, although covered, the use of data loggers is not planned for as systematically as other aspects of the ICT curriculum.  Well-planned links are made between ICT and literacy, numeracy and foundation subjects.  Two homework clubs ensure that those pupils who do not have access to computers at home are able to use ICT for homework and research after school.

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

The leadership and management of ICT are good.

p.2

Leadership and management of ICT

 In the past two years, there have been a number of changes in the leadership of the subject. However, the management of change has been good and has ensured a smooth transition from one subject leader to the next.  Technical support is good and ensures that systems are reliable and available when needed.  The school has taken the decision to no longer lease computers but to purchase hardware and software as required. This has improved value for money, which is now good.  Although staff and pupils have received training on e-safety, parents and carers have not been involved fully in a similar process.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving the curriculum for ICT by embedding further the use of data- logging across subjects  monitoring the quality of teaching, especially that of teaching assistants, to ensure that teaching and support for pupils, especially those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are consistently good  involving parents and carers more in ensuring that pupils are safe when using new technologies.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop ICT in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion