Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Philip Jarrett
- Postcode verified
M7 4XG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 34
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr D Deane Headteacher St Thomas of Canterbury Primary School Hadfield Street Higher Broughton Salford M7 4XG
p.1
Ofsted 2010 11 best practice study: English
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 13 October 2010 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted 2010 11 best practice study: English
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in English. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your school is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment before publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010 11 best practice study: English
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: meetings with teachers and pupils, scrutiny of documentation, and observation of three lessons.
p.1
Features of good practice
Effective senior leadership that is strongly focused on high-quality teaching and outcomes for pupils, sets high expectations, and encourages teachers to think for themselves and share good practice. Very good subject leadership, characterised by good collaborative work, enthusiasm and high levels of subject knowledge. A very good start in literacy for pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage with considerable emphasis on developing pupils’ speech and language. An effective phonics programme that is well staffed, flexible in meeting pupils’ needs, and taught in active ways that engage and motivate pupils. Very good strategies for encouraging pupils to read for enjoyment, including the developing use of the well-resourced library, close monitoring of pupils’ home reading, and placing good-quality texts and authors at the centre of the curriculum in English. A range of effective strategies that motivates boys, leading to better than
p.1
Features of good practice
average progress. An innovative and well-planned curriculum, with English at the centre, that links subjects well, engages pupils, and enables them to apply their literacy skills in a range of other contexts. Evidence of lively and effective teaching.
p.2
Features of good practice
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.
p.2
Features of good practice
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion