Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Paula Heaney
- Postcode verified
WD17 3EZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 79
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Ms E Rushton Principal West Herts College Watford Campus Hempstead Road Watford WD17 3EZ
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 14 October 2010 to look at work in securing and developing best value for money.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in value for money in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment before publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of success rate data for 2008/09, the most recent inspection report, and the 2008/09 self-assessment report; a demonstration and sampling of the college management information system; meetings with key managers and leaders in the college; and a meeting of a representative group of learners.
p.1
Features of good practice
Highly effective and successful governance, leadership and management ensure that the quality of the learner experience is central and is the key focus in driving forward and achieving the strategic and operational aims and objectives. Very high-quality college data and quality processes inform planning, monitoring and decision-making. Managers and teachers assess in-year progress and performance weekly so that prompt actions can be taken where necessary and good practice can be shared. Additional targeted support for learners identified as underachieving is reviewed regularly to assess its impact and effectiveness. Very strong financial and resource management, with close monitoring of budgets and course, teaching and room usage hours, ensure the efficient and effective use of resources across the college. A wide range of methods enables learners to share their views and experiences at college, including meetings with senior managers. This, in
p.1
Features of good practice
addition to the speed at which actions to generate improvements are put in place, results in high levels of learner satisfaction. Managers across the college are encouraged to talk to learners informally and follow up any concerns they may have. Staff involve learners directly in decisions which have an impact on the quality of their experiences at college. Examples include: contributing to college planning by designing small group and social spaces; selecting a catering contractor for the new college building; and helping to appoint new teachers. Teaching, learning and support are of a high quality as a result of: very effective and targeted development activities; close monitoring of teachers’ performance, which includes learner feedback; and by enhancing further the skills of teachers who already perform well. The college is committed to developing learners’ skills through a set of core competencies, including English, mathematics, information
p.2
Features of good practice
technology and learning and thinking skills, so that each learner is better prepared to achieve their main qualification, to progress to the next level of study within the college and to enter employment.
p.2
Areas for development
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to securing value for money in your college.
p.2
Areas for development
As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion