Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paula Heaney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paula Heaney

  • Postcode verified

    WD17 3EZ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings31w0
  • What needs to improve48w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
79
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 86%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms E Rushton Principal West Herts College Watford Campus Hempstead Road Watford WD17 3EZ

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 14 October 2010 to look at work in securing and developing best value for money.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in value for money in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment before publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of success rate data for 2008/09, the most recent inspection report, and the 2008/09 self-assessment report; a demonstration and sampling of the college management information system; meetings with key managers and leaders in the college; and a meeting of a representative group of learners.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Highly effective and successful governance, leadership and management ensure that the quality of the learner experience is central and is the key focus in driving forward and achieving the strategic and operational aims and objectives.  Very high-quality college data and quality processes inform planning, monitoring and decision-making. Managers and teachers assess in-year progress and performance weekly so that prompt actions can be taken where necessary and good practice can be shared. Additional targeted support for learners identified as underachieving is reviewed regularly to assess its impact and effectiveness.  Very strong financial and resource management, with close monitoring of budgets and course, teaching and room usage hours, ensure the efficient and effective use of resources across the college.  A wide range of methods enables learners to share their views and experiences at college, including meetings with senior managers. This, in

p.1

Features of good practice

addition to the speed at which actions to generate improvements are put in place, results in high levels of learner satisfaction. Managers across the college are encouraged to talk to learners informally and follow up any concerns they may have.  Staff involve learners directly in decisions which have an impact on the quality of their experiences at college. Examples include: contributing to college planning by designing small group and social spaces; selecting a catering contractor for the new college building; and helping to appoint new teachers.  Teaching, learning and support are of a high quality as a result of: very effective and targeted development activities; close monitoring of teachers’ performance, which includes learner feedback; and by enhancing further the skills of teachers who already perform well.  The college is committed to developing learners’ skills through a set of core competencies, including English, mathematics, information

p.2

Features of good practice

technology and learning and thinking skills, so that each learner is better prepared to achieve their main qualification, to progress to the next level of study within the college and to enter employment.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to securing value for money in your college.

p.2

Areas for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion