Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Pat Kime

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Pat Kime

  • Postcode verified

    WN6 8BD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellrapid progressgood progressenthusiasmpositiveeffectiveeffectivelystrengths
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings435w+74
  • Leadership110w+43
  • What needs to improve79w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
601
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 15%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Hanley Headteacher St Bernadette’s Catholic Primary School Church Lane Wigan Lancashire WN6 8BD

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils during my visit on 27 September 2010 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of three lessons and short visits to a further three lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is good.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Pupils make at least good progress in all aspects of English and their attainment overall in the subject is above average by the end of Key Stage 2.  Attainment is above average in reading and in speaking and listening but is average in writing.  Boys’ attainment is closer to that of girls than is typical nationally.  Pupils’ learning is aided by their good behaviour and application to work in lessons. They respond particularly well to challenging, pacy lessons in which teachers show genuine enthusiasm for the subject.

p.1

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 The bulk of the teaching observed was of a good quality and evidence of pupils’ progress confirms that this is typical.  Relationships between staff and pupils are very positive and behaviour is managed well so lessons run smoothly.  In the most effective lessons, teachers expected a lot of the pupils and had clear objectives for the learning. Pupils knew how they could judge their progress. These lessons moved along at a brisk pace and pupils were fully involved in productive question and answer sessions and discussions with their classmates. This meant that pupils had to work hard to keep up and they achieved a great deal.  Occasionally, when the pace of teaching was slower, some pupils did not sustain full attention.  Teachers use information and communication technology effectively as an integral part of lessons.  Phonics are taught very well in the Early Years Foundation Stage and the children are making rapid progress. Staff teach precisely and provide a

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

good range of well-considered activities to help the children consolidate new learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The curriculum covers all national requirements and matches pupils’ needs. Appropriate attention is given to drama, poetry and media.  The curriculum is adjusted thoughtfully to take account of the strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ performance. Initiatives, such as the recent increased focus on speaking and listening, spelling and handwriting, are implemented consistently across the school.  Pupils have a good range of opportunities to develop speaking and listening skills and to perform.  The range of activities provided to enrich the curriculum, such as extra- curricular clubs, visits and visitors, is satisfactory but has scope for improvement.  A good range of additional support utilises resources within and beyond the school for pupils who need extra help.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

Leadership and management in English are good.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 Teamwork is strong. You and the subject leader work in close partnership to keep close track of pupils’ progress and the quality of provision and to identify areas in need of further development. Your evaluation of the subject is accurate and planning for the future is sound.  A number of well-considered developments in recent years have improved the quality of provision in the subject and show signs of raising achievement.  Staff are receptive to new ideas and they benefit from a good amount of helpful guidance on new developments from the subject leader; this promotes consistency of provision and progression.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 raising attainment in writing  strengthening the provision of additional activities to enrich the English curriculum.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion