Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Oct 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Noonan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Noonan

  • Postcode verified

    PE1 1TU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisewell-plannedsuccessfulrigorouseffectivelyconsistentlyimprovedimproving
Criticismpoorat risklowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings619w+5
  • What needs to improve162w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
768
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 34, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Roxburgh Principal City College Peterborough Brook street Peterborough PE1 1TU

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 and 30 September 2010 to look at your work in numeracy.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with senior staff, tutors and learners; three observations of teaching and learning sessions in numeracy; and a review of the supporting documents that you provided.

p.1

numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives

Overall, The City College Peterborough is satisfactory at tackling the challenge of ensuring that young people and adults gain the numeracy skills they need for their careers and personal lives.

p.1

Key findings

 The college uses its very wide ranging partnerships well to keep up to date with trends in the local economy and social developments when reviewing its provision in numeracy. It provides a broad range of numeracy programmes to a wide range of learners, including: school pupils aged 14 to 16; learners aged 16 to 19 who are at risk of not being employed, in education or in training; adults returning to study; work-based learners taking apprenticeships and advanced apprenticeships; and those on learndirect programmes. The college is particularly successful at providing numeracy programmes in local settings, thus attracting learners that traditionally do not attend college.  Management and quality improvement arrangements for numeracy are satisfactory. The self-assessment is rigorous, but managers do not consider learners’ destinations on leaving a programme in sufficient detail when evaluating the quality of provision for all courses.

p.1

Key findings

 Numeracy tutors use the good opportunities for relevant staff training well to develop their expertise. Similarly, they meet regularly to share learning materials and good practice in the teaching and learning of numeracy. The college’s virtual learning environment contains useful materials for the planning of teaching, but it is not developed sufficiently for use by learners.  Teaching and learning were good in the lessons observed. Teachers had an informal, relaxed approach that created an atmosphere in which learners did not feel intimidated or afraid to ask questions. They used praise and encouragement well to help bolster the learners’ self- confidence, often following a fear of mathematics harboured from previous poor experiences and struggling to achieve in this subject.  Lessons were well-planned and involved a good variety of tasks that maintained learners’ focus and helped to consolidate what they were

p.2

Key findings

learning. Some younger learners showed challenging behaviour and teachers maintained order effectively to keep them focused on their learning.  Overall, outcomes for numeracy learners are satisfactory. Pass rates for learners completing courses in GSCE in mathematics, functional mathematics, the entry to employment course and learndirect programmes were high in 2009/10. Similarly, school pupils aged 14 to 16 attending vocational courses in the college achieved well. However, apprentices and advanced apprentices taking key skills application of number courses have consistently poor success rates.  Success rates for learners taking the entry level adult certificate in numeracy course were satisfactory. However, success rates for level 1 and 2 learners on this course dipped and were low in 2009/10. Senior managers attributed this to their recruitment of learners on programmes beyond their current ability level who did not take the final assessment.

p.2

Key findings

Procedures are now in place to ensure this does not happen again.  Attendance rates for adult learners on numeracy courses in 2009/10 improved to 74%, significantly below the college’s target of 80%.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving success rates of the certificate in adult numeracy at levels 1 and 2 by ensuring that adults and apprentices are recruited to the appropriate level of course thus making it more likely that they attain the required standards  continuing to improve the attendance rates of learners on numeracy courses  developing the college’s virtual learning environment to further extend its use for learners as well as staff  ensuring managers use all relevant data on learners’ progression to further education, training and employment when evaluating the effectiveness of the college’s numeracy programmes for self-assessment and quality improvement.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop numeracy at The City College Peterborough.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and the Skills Funding Agency.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion