Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Edwards

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Edwards

  • Postcode verified

    DY1 2AQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveextremelygood progressmake good progressconfidentlyclearlyenthusiastic
Criticismlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings626w+87
  • Leadership215w+61
  • What needs to improve99w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
927
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%Leadership 20%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs L Griffiths Headteacher Jesson’s C of E (VA) Primary School School Street Dudley West Midlands DY1 2AQ

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: early learning

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and children during my visit on 23 November 2010 to evaluate the provision and outcomes for children in communication, language and literacy and personal, social and emotional development.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: early learning

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: early learning

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, the Early Years Foundation Stage leader, parent representatives; scrutiny of relevant documentation, including assessments of children’s learning; and observation of sessions in the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: early learning

The effectiveness of meeting the children’s communication, language and literacy and personal, social and emotional learning and development needs is good.

p.1

Achievement

 Children achieve well over their time in the Early Years Foundation Stage in communication, language and literacy and in their personal, social and emotional development. From entry to Nursery, with extremely low levels of skill for their age, especially in speech and language development, children catch up well. Progress is particularly rapid for many in the Nursery in their personal, social and emotional development and in their speaking and listening skills. Reception year children chatter confidently, explain themselves clearly and are enthusiastic to initiate conversations with adults and others. This lays a strong foundation for them making good progress in developing reading and writing skills.  Standards rose markedly in 2010 to above the national average in all strands of language, communication and literacy, and in dispositions and attitudes and emotional development. There are no significant differences

p.1

Achievement

between the achievements of boys or girls because staff take effective steps to develop all children’s knowledge, skills and understanding through activities that catch their interest.  Children enjoy the activities provided for them in the spacious indoors and outdoor environments. New children settle quickly into the routines and learn from others’ good behaviour and positive attitudes. Children participate willingly in the carefully structured adult-led sessions and are able to concentrate for long periods of time on self-chosen activities. For example, a small group of children demonstrated determination and creativity in successfully making individual autumn collages. Children are provided with regular opportunities to take responsibility for their classroom, such as by tidying away as they sing along to the music.  Not all children make the progress they could because in some of the adult-led sessions they do not have opportunities to make choices of their

p.2

Achievement

own to develop their practical skills and abilities. For example, children spent too long under the direction of the teacher when mixing colours rather than being given the chance to experiment for themselves.

p.2

Quality of provision

 The school has given considerable thought as to how to make best use of the extensive indoor and outdoor areas. To encourage children to develop skills covering all areas of learning, each indoor classroom has a specific focus for learning. Resources are available openly and labelled clearly which promote children’s independence. Adults are deployed carefully to ensure that children make the best use of their time when working independently. However, leaders are aware that opportunities for mark- making and writing outdoors are less well developed.  All staff skilfully engage children in activities that interest them. For example, following an autumn walk in the park, adults used questioning effectively to encourage children to feel and express empathy in a story- telling session. Throughout the setting vibrant displays are ongoing records of children’s broad experiences and progress over the year.

p.2

Quality of provision

 From regular observations and records of children’s learning, staff know the children as individuals. They keep a close eye on those with special educational needs and/or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language. The school has developed strong links with other agencies to support their work in this area and to support families as well as individuals’ special educational needs. Parents and carers say that they have confidence in the work of the school in meeting the learning needs of their children.  Children make good progress in reading and writing in the Reception year partly because of good, structured teaching of letters and sounds (phonics) which follows national guidance. However, the school acknowledges there is scope to ensure children are given more opportunities to experiment with writing, especially outdoors.

p.2

Leadership and management

 Decisive and innovative leadership has resulted in significant changes in practice and a marked rise in outcomes for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Through creative team work, children’s use of time has been organised carefully to create a better balance between teacher-led activities and child-initiated learning.  Partnership work with parents and carers is a particular strength of the school. Through curriculum workshops and opportunities to work alongside children in school, parents and carers gain a good understanding of how children learn and how they can work with the school to support their children’s learning at home.  The Early Years Foundation Stage leader works closely with senior leaders to gain an accurate view of what has worked well and where action is needed to improve the quality of provision further. For example, through the school’s performing arts status, children have good opportunities to

p.3

Leadership and management

develop their self-esteem by visiting other feeder nursery schools to perform as a choir.  Adults work well together as a team. This has enabled leaders to develop and record the way children’s progress is monitored. For example, by displaying the learning intentions of an activity nearby for adults to see and providing simple and effective ways for adults to record their observations of children’s learning as it takes place.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 enhancing the outdoor provision so that it provides similarly good opportunities for children to practise writing to those available indoors  creating more opportunities for children to make their own choices in developing their practical skills and abilities.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the Early Years Foundation Stage in the school. As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion