Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amraz Ali

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Amraz Ali

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
83
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 83%

Full report text

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: school governance

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 November 2010 to look at school governance.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: school governance

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in school governance. The publication will include case studies about individual schools. If Pickering Community Infant school is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment before publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 best practice survey: school governance

The evidence used to inform the identification of features of best practice included: a review of documentation, and meetings with a range of governors, staff and the clerk to the governing body.

p.1

Features of best practice

 Governors are keen and highly motivated to do their best for the school and its pupils. They have a clear understanding of their role in challenging and supporting the work of the school.  An audit of governors’ skills has ensured that the experience, expertise and interest of governors are used to very good effect. For example, those with extensive buildings, health and safety or human resource experience make very good contributions to the school.  The annual plan for all governing body meetings and committee meetings ensures that the work and development of governors is thorough and systematic. The two-year cycle of governor self-review has led to effective plans for the development of governance.  Protocols for governors to visit the school on a formal basis help them to gain an accurate picture of the work of the school. Worthy of note is the ‘governor of the month’ scheme, where a governor is encouraged to get to

p.1

Features of best practice

know, in detail, the work of the school during a month. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Features of best practice

Mrs L Brammah Headteacher Pickering Community Infant and Nursery School, Ruffa Lane Pickering YO18 7AT  Governors have developed very good arrangements to manage and collect evidence for your annual performance review.  Governors are provided with a wide range of information and reports; this includes pupils’ progress data and information about the quality of teaching. Of particular note is the system of providing governors with a wide range of documents, discussion papers and policies for review through the internet.  New governors state that they are made to feel very welcome and included; they value their induction, the openness of existing governors and the system of providing them with a mentor governor.

p.1

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 sharing, in addition to the current annual evaluations of pupils’ progress and performance, even more of the termly pupil progress information with governors.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to further develop governance.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion