Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dilip Kadodwala

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dilip Kadodwala

  • Postcode verified

    NN14 1NB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveenthusiasmclearstrengthssecureimproving
Criticismweaknessesinsufficientnot alwayslimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings439w−50
  • Leadership52w+60
  • What needs to improve97w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
575
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 75%Leadership 9%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Shortt Headteacher Broughton Primary School Cransley Hill Broughton Kettering NN14 1NB

p.1

education (RE)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 14 October 2010 to look at work in RE.

p.1

education (RE)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

education (RE)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of two lessons.

p.1

education (RE)

The overall effectiveness of RE is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in RE

 The standards reached by pupils by the end of Key Stage 2 are in line with the expectations set out in the Northamptonshire agreed syllabus. Pupils can describe the key elements of religions they have studied, especially Christianity.  Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory. They appreciate the importance that religion and belief play in many people’s lives. However, pupils’ ability to investigate, analyse and apply religious concepts is limited because of weaknesses in planning. Pupils have insufficient opportunities to ‘learn from’ religion.  The contribution of RE to pupils’ personal development is good. They have positive attitudes to learning about different religions and beliefs and cultural diversity. Behaviour in the lessons observed was good.

p.1

Quality of teaching of RE

The quality of teaching of RE is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of RE

 Teachers use a broad range of stimulus material to engage pupils and enliven learning. For example, in one of the lessons observed, good use was made of artefacts from the Jewish traditions. Information and communication technology is used well as a tool to promote learning.  Much of the learning is well-organised and enjoyable. However, the range of skills that pupils are required to use does not always fully extend to investigating religion and belief.  Lesson plans identify learning objectives which are used by teachers to assess pupils’ progress. However, as yet there is no systematic way to monitor pupils’ progress or inform teachers’ planning in the light of ongoing assessment.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in RE

The quality of the curriculum in RE is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in RE

 Reasonably detailed long- and medium-term plans are in place, supported by other guidance material which helps to provide structured lessons.  Planning overemphasises the subject content at the expense of making each unit of work more challenging in terms of developing the skills of enquiry, investigation and evaluation.  Visits to local churches and the use of visitors to school help to enrich RE.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in RE

The effectiveness of leadership and management in RE is satisfactory with good capacity to improve.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in RE

 The subject leader brings enthusiasm and vision to the role and subject.  Senior leaders have a clear view of the strengths and areas for improvement and have a clear action plan to raise standards further.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving planning to secure a clearer focus on the development of learning skills in RE, including ‘learning from’ religion  developing a more structured approach to the monitoring of pupils’ progress to help teachers make secure assessments about standards reached by the pupils. I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and SACRE and will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion