Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen McShane

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen McShane

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimproving

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
538
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 September 2010 to look at your centre’s use of alternative provision. Please also thank your colleagues from the local authority whom I met.

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

As outlined in my initial letter, the visit had a particular focus on examining the use of alternative provision for students who are vulnerable to underachieving, and the impact this has on the outcomes for these students .

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Outcomes

 The majority of students gain a wide range of suitable qualifications in the core curriculum and other subjects such as art and history. You have also developed provision in the centre so that students gain skills in hairdressing and catering. Through partnerships with other providers students gain qualifications in handling power boats, construction and land-based studies.  Students currently attending placements felt that they were learning important skills. They said they were gaining confidence and learning how to work in an adult environment. This is preparing them well for their future education, employment or training. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Outcomes

Mr A Wood Headteacher The Compass 307a Chickerell Road Weymouth Dorset DT4 0QU

p.1

Selecting and commissioning

 The centre has a wide range of alternative provision. It has made decisions about when it is more appropriate for courses to be delivered on-site to ensure their success and developed provision such as a hair and beauty salon and a catering kitchen.  Through a detailed knowledge of the local area, staff have developed a network of providers. The Pupil Programming Officer ensures that checks are made on all providers and that students are matched to areas that interest them.  The centre is currently part of a project to commission providers which is intended to bring some county-wide consistency to this area of work as well as potentially improving the selection, delivery, monitoring, evaluation and quality of providers.

p.2

Monitoring, evaluation and support

 Very close working relationships with providers and centre staff as well as detailed knowledge of each student’s needs means that any problems can be quickly addressed.  Attendance is monitored carefully. Providers give regular reports on progress. The centre has a wealth of anecdotal evidence of the outcomes and how well students are progressing. It is currently developing a system to improve the tracking of progress and attitude to learning of individual students. This has the potential to also result in more effective evaluation of different provision.  Students recognise that the provision they receive helps them to decide what they know, what they would like to do when they leave school and appreciate the opportunities they receive which is helping them to achieve.

p.2

Monitoring, evaluation and support

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop alternative provision in the centre.

p.2

Monitoring, evaluation and support

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion