Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Seath

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Seath

  • Postcode verified

    M50 3SR

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+91Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentexceptionalexceptionallyeffectivewell plannedconsistentlyeffectivelysuccessfully

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings475w+91
  • What needs to improve64w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
525
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 88%What needs to improve 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Sim Principal Salford City College Frontier House Merchant Quay Salford M50 3SR

p.1

science in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit between 1 and 3 February 2011 as part of our science survey.

p.1

science in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to a national report. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributors or contributing institutions but individuals and institutions will not be identified in the main text without their agreement.

p.1

science in colleges

The evidence included: meetings with senior managers, the heads of science, course team leaders, teaching staff, tutors and students; observations of six lessons; discussions with students; review of students’ work; and analysis of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice

 Success rates are high in access to higher education provision, GCE A levels and a majority of AS subjects, as well as in the National Diploma in applied science; a course with significantly increasing numbers of students.  The proportion of students that progress to higher education from all courses is exceptionally high.  Lessons are consistently interesting and are well planned, with a good mix of learning activities that build sequentially on students’ knowledge and understanding.  Students demonstrate good development of study skills and the ability to work both collaboratively and independently. By the time they have completed courses, they are accomplished learners.  Students’ progress is monitored effectively and is accompanied by target- setting that they use and understand well.  Students make very good use of the college’s virtual learning environment to help them make progress.  The college offers many well-attended and publicised science clubs and

p.1

Features of good practice

special events that successfully raise students’ aspirations and ambitions. These include outside speakers, themed events such as biomedical, veterinary and medical careers sessions, and an Oxbridge and Russell group preparation club.  Liaison with local secondary schools is excellent. This has included specific taster events, and successful invitations to school pupils to attend college science clubs.  The college has an imaginative collaboration with a local hospital to enable some students to undertake relevant work experience. Together with college-based events and mock interviews, this has resulted in an increased number of students progressing to study medicine.  Well-organised and frequent events and visits to nearby universities have led to close working relationships that are developing quickly.  Exceptional leadership stimulates both staff and students to overcome barriers to achievement. The management of the curriculum has a clear

p.2

Features of good practice

and focused drive for improvement.  The effective lesson observation system places an appropriate emphasis on learning and identifies areas for development well.  The effective and systematic identification and sharing of best practice are well developed. Accurate self-evaluation is sufficiently critical and recognises areas for improvement as well as strengths.

p.2

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

 continuing to improve success rates in a small minority of GCE AS courses.

p.2

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop science provision.

p.2

Area for development, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to the relevant funding bodies and will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion