Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Johnson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Johnson

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveambitiouspositiveimproving
Criticismlackbelowpersistently absentmissedlowabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
768
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mr K P Dyson Headteacher St Andrew's CofE Primary School Mardale Avenue Orford Warrington Cheshire WA2 9HF

p.1

Primary School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 23 February 2011, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Would you pass on my thanks to the pupils, staff, members of the governing body and the representative from the local authority whom I met.

p.1

Primary School

There have been significant changes to staff since the previous inspection particularly in Key Stage 2. Four new teachers have been appointed and one teacher is currently on maternity leave. The school has enhanced the safety of the playground by the provision of electronic gates.

p.1

Primary School

As a result of the inspection on 10 February 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.

p.1

Primary School

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.

p.1

Primary School

In 2010, the national tests results at the end of Key Stage 2 improved. In mathematics, attainment reached the national average. In English, despite improvement to levels of reading, attainment remained below average due to the low standards attained in writing. The proportion of pupils reaching the highest levels of attainment remained below national averages in both subjects. Generally girls reached higher levels than boys. Pupils known to be entitled to free school meals continued to attain particularly well. Pupils’ progress in mathematics improved, although in English it dipped slightly. Teacher assessments show that attainment and progress in science improved significantly. Lesson planning in science has also improved. In Key Stage 1, pupils’ progress and attainment were maintained at around the levels achieved in 2009. January 2011

p.1

Primary School

Page2 In the four lessons observed in Key Stage 2, pupils enjoyed learning and developed skills, knowledge and understanding at a level appropriate for their age. The majority made satisfactory progress. In the few instances where progress was slower, teachers did not use assessment of pupils’ prior skills and abilities to personalise learning. This meant that some pupils, particularly the more able, spent too long listening to teachers and not enough time learning independently.

p.2

Primary School

At the time of the previous inspection, the school was asked to improve attendance levels, particularly of pupils who were persistent absentees. Despite the best efforts of the school the proportion of pupils who were persistently absent rose in 2010 and remains high compared to other schools. The proportion of sessions missed due to absence also rose and is above average. The school continues to work hard with the small number of pupils involved and their families and so far this year attendance levels are slightly higher.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils’ understanding of the richness of the wider world has grown significantly because the effective work the school has done to develop its links with schools both in the UK and abroad. The ‘Down our way’ project and its partnership work with other schools have enhanced the positive impact the school has on the cohesiveness of its own and the wider community.

p.2

Primary School

The school’s arrangements to keep a single central register for the recruitment of staff continue to meet government recommendations. The local authority has provided satisfactory support to the school and the ‘Improving Schools Programme’ has proved to be particularly valuable in assisting with the development of a more-effective method of assessing pupils’ progress.

p.2

Primary School

The school has demonstrated a satisfactory track record of improvement, although leaders are aware that considerable work still needs to be done if it is to reach its ambitious goals. For example, currently the school’s self-evaluation process, development plan, lesson observation system and programme for professional development exist as separate processes and lack sufficient coordination.

p.2

Primary School

I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

February 2010

 Improve learning and progress in science by:  adopting the good assessment, target-setting and marking practices used in the teaching of English and mathematics  ensuring a better match of lesson activities to the learning needs of pupils through more effective planning.

p.3

February 2010

 Improve attendance further, especially that of persistent absentees.

p.3

February 2010

 Broaden pupils’ understanding of the richness of the wider world and their contact with it.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion