Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Angela Konarzewski
- Postcode verified
ME4 6PX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes14
“inadequate progress in making improvements” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 915
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr D McBride Headteacher St Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School Hills Terrace Chatham Kent ME4 6PX
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 8 February 2011, for the time you gave to our discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to governors for their time and to the Year 6 pupils to whom I spoke.
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
Following a period of uncertainty, owing to long-term sickness absence amongst members of the senior leadership team, including the former headteacher and deputy headteacher, a new headteacher took up his post in September 2010. Since then, there has been a substantial turnover of staff and a new senior leadership team has been established. A number of teachers are currently on short-term, temporary contracts. In addition, a complete restructuring of the support staff is ongoing.
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 19−20 May 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made:
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
inadequate progress in making improvements
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square BRISTOL BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0845 123 6001 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email :rebecca.jackson@tribalgroup.com Page 2 Results from national tests in 2010 showed that pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics at the end of Years 2 and 6 remained at levels which were significantly below national average. The progress made by pupils from the end of Year 2 to the end of Year 6 was also significantly lower than average. School data for the current academic year indicate that pupils in Year 6 are more likely to achieve the school’s targets, but the pattern of progress across the school is still too variable. While there is evidence of accelerated progress being made by some groups, most notably in the Early Years Foundation Stage and in Years 2 and 5, the school still has some way to
p.1
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
go if all pupils are to reach their challenging targets in all year groups by the end of the school year.
p.2
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
Since his appointment, the headteacher has demonstrated a relentless focus on putting new systems into place to monitor and evaluate the work of the school, in order to improve the quality of teaching, raise attainment and accelerate pupils’ progress. A new leadership team has now been established and middle leaders are contributing very positively to the school’s capacity for sustained improvement. They said, ‘For us, the new headteacher was like a breath of fresh air.... Until he came everyone was doing their own thing.’ Increasingly, curriculum leaders are monitoring and evaluating provision in their areas and implementing improvements to accelerate achievement. In addition, support is being provided by the local authority through advisers and consultants, and an advisory teacher is working alongside Year 6 staff effectively to model good practice.
p.2
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
During the monitoring visit, five lesson observations were undertaken jointly with the headteacher, and these demonstrated that teaching has improved significantly since the last inspection. The strengths and weaknesses of each lesson were agreed, showing that the current leadership is accurate in its judgements and strategies for improving teaching are effective. For example, teachers were demonstrating good practice in making clear what pupils were expected to learn and in assessing their progress. However, in some classes, teaching was not sufficiently adapted to challenge pupils of different levels of ability including pupils who speak English as an additional language. These were key areas for improvement in the last inspection and remain so in some classes. Pupils were sometimes listening to teachers in lessons for too long which slowed the pace and made them restless before they settled down to tasks that reinforced or promoted their learning.
p.2
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
Pupils speak very positively of the school and the new headteacher. In the words of one pupil, ‘Now he’s come, the school’s getting much, much better. He’s bringing in new books and making it all nice.’ They complained that, as was the case at the last inspection, there are still not enough opportunities to use computers. The school has made inadequate progress in addressing this issue. Although the behaviour of pupils in lessons is exemplary, out of lessons, for example in corridors and at play times, there is evidence of some boisterous behaviour which is not managed well, particularly at lunch times. Page 3 There are now clear signs of progress. However, it is only in the last term, under the leadership of the new headteacher, that improvement strategies have begun to have a positive impact.
p.2
Michael’s Roman Catholic Primary School
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.3
place in May 2009
Increase the amount of pace and challenge in lessons to involve pupils more actively in their learning and help them make swifter progress.
p.4
place in May 2009
Ensure the lesson activities meet the needs of all pupils, particularly those learning English as an additional language, in order to raise achievement and standards.
p.4
place in May 2009
Increase the opportunities for pupils to use their information and communication (ICT) skills regularly throughout the curriculum.
p.4
place in May 2009
Increase the effectiveness of subject leaders by making sure they have the opportunity to monitor and evaluate the strategies used to raise achievement and standards in their areas.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion