Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Charalambos Loizou
- Postcode verified
LE4 0UT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 868
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 26 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 1 5 November 2010
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Mr Kevin Lacey Barley Croft Primary School Malham Close Beaumont Leys Leicester LE4 0UT
p.1
Croft Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on Thursday 4 November 2010, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the chair and vice chair of the governing body, who made themselves available at short notice, and also pupils and those teachers observed during lessons, as well as the staff and parents spoken to during the visit. The central record of suitability checks on staff was scrutinised and it meets the current government requirements.
p.1
Croft Primary School
There have been significant staff changes since the school’s last inspection. At the time of the visit the school was undergoing substantial refurbishment which has displaced Key Stage 2 pupils and children in the Early Years Foundation Stage into temporary classrooms until further building work is completed.
p.1
Croft Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 10 February 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Croft Primary School
Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.
p.1
Croft Primary School
Although attainment remains low in English and below average in mathematics, the coordinated efforts of the staff are raising standards. As at the time of the last inspection, most children join the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills and aptitudes that are well below those expected of four-year-olds, and the mobility of pupils joining or leaving the school at different times is high. These are significant barriers to raising attainment which the school is addressing through effective Serco Inspections Boundary House 2 Wythall Green Way Middle Lane BIRMINGHAM West Midlands B47 6LW OFSTED T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk SERCO Direct T 0121 683 2888
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 2 leadership, improved teaching and learning and more consistent use of assessment and learning targets. Pupils continue to make satisfactory progress in reading, writing and mathematics, with accelerated progress being made in Years 5 and 6, particularly in mathematics, where standards are edging closer towards those expected of pupils nationally at the end of Year 6.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The headteacher has strengthened the teaching through carefully considered appointments and changes to staff responsibilities. Senior staff now engage in more widespread and systematic monitoring of lessons and pupils’ work. As a result, teachers’ planning has improved and incorporates more specific tasks for pupils of different abilities. However, teachers tend to over-direct or spend too much time talking to pupils, leaving less time for them to learn independently. Learning targets are now set more consistently across classes and, increasingly, are being refined in teachers’ planning to meet the needs of the more able or those close to age-related levels. Teachers have adopted a consistent marking system to help pupils improve their work and understand the next steps to their learning. However, the work set for pupils is not always challenging enough so that some just fall short of their expected learning targets the next time these are reviewed.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
Pupils’ behaviour in lessons has improved and they are coping well with the temporary disruption caused by refurbishment work. In lessons, they are encouraged to cooperate with their ‘talk partners’ or share their thoughts in groups, which ensure that they contribute or generate their own ideas. Sharper monitoring of lessons has helped to improve the effectiveness of support staff who are assigned to pupils who find learning difficult. Teachers plan their work carefully to involve teaching assistants more in supporting pupils with behavioural difficulties. However, too much over-direction or tasks that do not expect enough of pupils leads to some minor disruptive behaviour. The pupils spoken to during the inspection stated that they enjoy learning and, as one pupil put it, ‘Teachers always help us.’ These sentiments reflect the warm and positive relationships that exist between staff and pupils, views that also correspond with those expressed by some parents and carers.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
The local authority advisory team and school improvement partner have provided satisfactory support. Regular visits combined with systematic reviews have helped to keep the school on a consistent course of improvement. This has also helped to increase the school’s capacity for sustained improvement as subject leaders and senior staff are taking more responsibility for evaluating the school’s performance.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.2
PROTECT-INSPECTION
September 2010 PROTECT-INSPECTION Page 3
p.3
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection which took
Improve the quality of learning by ensuring that the small steps which successfully build upon pupils’ levels of skills and knowledge are planned carefully for pupils of all abilities, especially the more able. Develop the monitoring and evaluating skills of all leaders. Ensure that the support for pupils with behavioural difficulties does not detract from the learning of other pupils. Ensure that pupils’ targets for improvement are part of their daily learning.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion