Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sheena MacDonald

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sheena MacDonald

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+74Very positivemore positive than 74% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery welleffectivepositivestronggood progressnurturingcaringconfidently
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings423w+72
  • What needs to improve85w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
499
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit with Linda Rockey HMI on 7 December as part of our survey on the use of nurture groups for pupils who are vulnerable to underachieving.

p.1

11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to a national report. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributors or contributing institutions but individuals and institutions will not be identified in the main text without your agreement

p.1

11 survey inspection programme: nurture groups

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

 Senior leaders demonstrated a clarity of purpose and vision in setting up nurture group provision to address particular concerns. They were thorough in seeking advice and putting training in place to ensure success.  Staff are well trained and passionate about the nurture approach. Many of the principles and approaches have been adapted to create a ‘nurturing school’ for all pupils with a strong commitment to developing good learning behaviour.  The nurture group was established within the context of a caring school which knows its pupils and families very well and where communication between staff and home is regular, honest and effective. Parents and carers are very positive about the nurture provision and the impact that this has on their children. Pupils are also positive about their experiences in the Orchard class and are able to speak confidently about the progress that they and their friends made during that time.

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1234 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

Mrs B O’Shea Headteacher Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Primary School, Yardley Wood Birmingham B13 0EU  The initial and ongoing assessment procedures, alongside professional knowledge of the pupils, are used well to select pupils and to identify and tackle specific difficulties.  The school pays careful attention to the inclusion of pupils who are receiving nurture support and they remain a full part of the school, taking part in assemblies and whole-school activities.  Well-considered reintegration procedures and effective communication between staff have enabled pupils to make smooth transitions from nurture group to larger class groupings.  The school’s data indicate that the pupils who attended the nurture group made very good progress in their social and emotional development. Their improved learning skills have enabled them to make significantly accelerated progress with their reading, writing and mathematics.

p.1

Strengths of the nurture group provision

 Monitoring by senior staff is rigorous. The governing body is involved in making key decisions and evaluating the group’s impact.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed

 Use the assessment information and professional knowledge to identify more specific targets for success in order to more effectively evaluate the impact of the provision.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed

I hope that this visit has been useful in the further development of this aspect of the school’s work.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion