Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ceri Morgan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ceri Morgan

  • Postcode verified

    BS11 0PA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 81% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghigh expectationsstrongexceptionalexceptionallypositivethrivestrengths
Criticismnot exceptionalgapslimitednot confident

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings639w+85
  • Leadership84w+55
  • What needs to improve103w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
816
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 9%What needs to improve 11%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Kloska Headteacher Our Lady of the Rosary Catholic Primary School Tide Grove Lawrence Weston Bristol BS11 0PA

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 1 December 2010 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; a scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; observation of six lessons and a meeting with a representative of the governing body.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

Achievement in mathematics is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

 Attainment has been significantly above national averages every year since 2006 and, in 2010, every pupil reached at least the level expected by age 11 in mathematics. Significantly, almost 75% reached the higher level. This success is well above what is found nationally.  In two of the last three years, the progress made by pupils in mathematics has been in the best 2% nationally. This is a considerable achievement. There are no significant differences in the performances of different groups of pupils within the school and all achieve well. For example, pupils who are in the early stages of learning English or who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make equally impressive progress. There are some minor fluctuations between classes and year groups or over time but these are always within very positive trends.  Pupils are particularly strong in their understanding of basic number skills,

p.1

Achievement in mathematics

their use of precise mathematical vocabulary, and their knowledge of the properties of shape; they have an outstanding awareness of standard and non-standard methods of calculation. Pupils are fluent in mental mathematics. Despite this powerful performance, there is scope for further developing the key skills of estimation and application of knowledge in a range of exploratory and investigative activities.  Pupils thoroughly enjoy mathematics. They speak enthusiastically about challenging activities and discuss and tackle problems with energy. For example, pupils had an extended and lively debate about which was the ‘bigger fraction’, three eighths or four tenths, which they continued as they left the classroom. Pupils thrive on such rich mathematical dialogue and demonstrate very positive attitudes to the subject.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

The quality of teaching of mathematics is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

 Every teacher was observed teaching mathematics. In each lesson, teaching was either good or outstanding. Good use of relationships, with a very detailed knowledge of each pupil’s particular mathematical needs, led to highly personalised and effective questioning. Brisk pace, high expectations and a thoughtful use of targets captured exceptional progress. The use of resources was imaginative, especially in the use of interactive whiteboards. In one class, nine-year-old pupils were happily suggesting formal algebraic formulae to use in a spreadsheet to solve a problem. Other pupils were discussing proportion, ratio and scale to help draw a life-sized giant when they only had his huge glove as a clue. This variety of tasks and challenge is welcomed by pupils.  Teachers used assessment well. Careful questioning led to accurate assessment which was then used to plan the next sessions. Learning support assistants play a full part in this process. The support offered to

p.2

Quality of teaching of mathematics

pupils who need it is outstanding. Teachers do not just ‘deliver’ lessons but respond continuously to what the pupils are saying and doing in each session. Marking is up-to-date and developmental. Pupils respond well to teachers’ high expectations and insistence on good work, neat presentation and accuracy.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

The quality of the mathematics curriculum is good.

p.2

Quality of the mathematics curriculum

 Despite the obvious strengths outlined above, the curriculum has some gaps. It is broad, balanced and thoughtful and what is covered is taught exceptionally well but a heavy dependence on number and weekly test practice is evident. Similarly, some pupils get limited opportunities to use their obvious skills in open and investigative problems. As a result, pupils are less confident in the key skills of estimation and visualisation. There is no ‘Maths Club’, for example, despite enthusiasm for one by pupils, and enrichment activities are often corralled into Friday’s lessons rather than being used as starter activities for a sequence of lessons. Some very able pupils in particular would benefit from wider enrichment activities.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of mathematics is outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management of mathematics

 As headteacher and in your role as subject leader, you are an enthusiastic and knowledgeable ambassador for mathematics and are well supported by colleagues and governors. The subject is well resourced. Particular strengths are the detailed and ambitious use of target-setting and monitoring procedures. The school does not settle for less than exceptional progress. This ethos, together with the high quality of teaching and teamwork, provides a very strong capacity to improve.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing the curriculum further by increasing opportunities for investigative and extended problem-solving activities, thereby enriching the wider mathematics curriculum, and ensuring that activities are not isolated  considering ways of offering extended challenge for all, but especially the more able, via greater enrichment activities and real-life problems.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion