Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jan 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Harrison

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Harrison

  • Postcode verified

    SR2 7BD

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent
Criticismlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings40w−33
  • What needs to improve70w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
108
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%What needs to improve 25%About the inspection 61%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms C Pickup Principal European Services for People With Autism (ESPA) Limited 6 7 The Cloisters Ashbrooke Sunderland SR2 7BD Dear Ms Pickup

p.1

Ofsted best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 22 September 2010 to look at your provision for safeguarding learners.

p.1

Ofsted best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in safeguarding in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If ESPA is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment on the text before publication.

p.1

Features of good practice:

 strong commitment to safeguarding from senior leaders and trustees  successful creation of a positive health and safety culture which greatly benefits learners  extensive partnership work that is used very effectively to strengthen safeguarding provision  excellent staff training that ensures they are confident about safeguarding procedures  contributions from staff and learners welcomed and used effectively as part of a culture of continuous improvement  very effective promotion of safeguarding in the curriculum through the use of comprehensive risk assessments, and emotional literacy and relationship training which meet the needs of individual learners very well.

p.1

Areas for development:

 continue to simplify the amount of paperwork associated with risk assessments  increase awareness-raising work with learners’ families and guardians to promote training on independent travel.

p.2

Areas for development:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop safeguarding provision in the college.

p.2

Areas for development:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion