Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Bowles
- Postcode verified
BB12 8HT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Increasing the confidence of pupils to write independently at the highest levels. p.2
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 107
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs J Bradley Headteacher Padiham St Leonard’s CE Primary School Moor Lane Padiham Lancashire BB12 8HT
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 and 12 November 2010 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in English. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your school is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: observation of the work of the school, including four lessons; examples of pupils’ writing; and discussions with staff and pupils.
p.1
Features of best practice
The school’s exciting curriculum inspires pupils to make outstanding progress in English. Intriguing scenarios, visits and role play stimulate pupils to communicate powerfully. They speak and write for compelling purposes which they help to define. As a result, by the end of Key Stage 2 they use spoken and written language effectively and understand how reading and writing skills are relevant to their lives. Standards by the end of Key Stage 2 are at least average, although not quite as high in writing as in reading, and this represents outstanding progress from pupils’ starting points. All staff work together to develop whole-school themes and activities, utilising their talents and interests and a wide range of visitors. The team of subject leaders helps to ensure that medium term plans build skills progressively. These plans are flexible and, at class level, pupils play a key part in choosing what and how they will learn.
p.1
Features of best practice
The school recruits enthusiastic staff and invests in their skills. Adults working with pupils make a very effective contribution to group work in class as a result of training which has included leading activities which link sounds and letters, using ICT, and engaging pupils in creative work. Planning, delivery and evaluation in each class are done by teamwork. As a result, pupils are well known as individuals to all staff and their progress is well supported and monitored. Tasks and activities are matched carefully to pupils’ needs and strengths and have a clearly defined purpose. Lively, responsive teaching successfully involves pupils in working out what counts as good writing or speaking and how they can achieve it. Pupils have specific and up-to-date targets. They are guided well to reflect thoughtfully on what they have learnt and what they should try next.
p.2
Areas for development
Increasing the confidence of pupils to write independently at the highest levels.
p.2
Areas for development
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.
p.2
Areas for development
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion