Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Sharples
- Postcode verified
CH44 6QW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement. p.1
- This was engaging pupils in their learning which impacted on the good progress they made. p.2
- Provide consistently effective challenge for the more able pupils to raise achievement. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment13
“In lessons observed the quality of teaching was strong.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,150
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr G Lahive Headteacher Riverside Primary School Brighton Street Wallasey Merseyside CH44 6QW
p.1
Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 24 November 2010, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please also extend my thanks to the staff, pupils and governor with whom I spoke during the course of the inspection.
p.1
Primary School
Since the time of the previous inspection one assistant headteacher has left due to promotion and four teaching assistants have left due to cuts in funding. In addition, the proportion of pupils known to be entitled to free school meals has risen by 12 percentage points to 70%.
p.1
Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 19 and 20 May 2009, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made good progress in making improvements and good progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.
p.1
Primary School
As at the previous inspection, children enter the Nursery with skills which are very low and below those expected for their age. These low skill levels remain as the children move through the Early Years Foundation Stage and transfer into Year1. This slow progress is hindered by high levels of absence which in turn affects the level of skills acquired. At the time of the previous inspection the overall attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 was well below average. In 2010 the overall attainment improved and is now broadly in line with national averages. However, mathematics at Key Stage 1 remains below the national average. Overall there is a trend of improvement across Key Stage 1 and given their low levels on entry, pupils are Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Primary School
Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com September 2010 Page 2 making improved progress in most aspects of their learning. The overall attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 has been broadly in line with national averages over the last three years up to 2010. At the previous inspection the Level 4+ attainment in English was well below average. In 2010 this improved and is now in line. The unvalidated data for the national assessments show that overall pupils are making significantly better progress by the end of Year 6 compared to rates of progress nationally. This rate of progress was confirmed through the lesson observations and the pupils’ work seen during the inspection. Raising the achievement of more able pupils was one area for improvement identified at the previous inspection. The scrutiny of lesson plans and observing pupils at work showed that generally the
p.1
Primary School
more able pupils are being challenged through appropriately levelled activities and are achieving higher standards of work.
p.2
Primary School
Overall rates of attendance remain low. This is mainly down to the low attendance figures for pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage and up to the end of Key Stage 1. The school has to contend with a small core of persistent absentees whose parents are hard to reach. Nevertheless the school continues to work hard on this issue. It has introduced a range of strategies including: a walking bus, employment of a family support worker, attendance awards and rewards, an attendance plan and use of parental fines. These strategies have been effective in the case of some identified families.
p.2
Primary School
In lessons observed the quality of teaching was strong. Teachers used a good range of teaching and learning styles. This was engaging pupils in their learning which impacted on the good progress they made. Teachers’ planning is effective in ensuring that the range of pupils’ abilities is catered for. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well through the effective use of teaching assistants and appropriately planned activities. As a result their achievement is improving.
p.2
Primary School
Scrutiny of pupils’ work showed that teachers are applying the school’s marking policy in all year groups. Teachers are expected to give two positive comments and one comment for improvement. While all teachers are doing this the quality of the comments for improvement is not yet consistent across each year group. Similarly the quality of handwriting across the school is not yet consistently high. Handwriting is good in some year groups for some individuals but more work is needed on this aspect of writing.
p.2
Primary School
All pupils have individual targets which they know well and which are reviewed regularly. The school uses an effective class tracking system for teachers to monitor pupils’ levels of attainment on a termly basis. This tracking of individuals and whole year groups is linked closely into the whole school target setting process. The school sets challenging targets using a nationally recognised scheme. In 2010 each of the schools targets were surpassed. September 2010 Page 3 The senior leadership of the school is showing improved capacity to move the school forward. This can be seen through: the raised standards of attainment at Key Stage 1, improved attainment in English at Key Stage 2 and the improving rates of progress made by the time pupils leave school. The school has produced a well structured improvement plan which identifies clearly all the key areas for moving the school forward. There is a clear vision for the school centred on improving the
p.2
Primary School
attainment for all pupils. This is shared by all staff. There are clear established systems in place for monitoring and evaluating progress against all areas for improvement within the plan. Members of the senior leadership regularly conduct lesson observations, learning walks and a scrutiny of pupils’ work. These are followed up with constructive and effective written feedbacks to all staff which in turn promote improvement.
p.3
Primary School
The local authority has continued to provide effective support for the school. The local authority’s confidence in the school is seen through the way it uses the school as an example of good practice in areas such as: phonics teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage and the work on improving teaching and learning styles.
p.3
Primary School
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.3
place in (insert month and year)
Improve pupils' handwriting and spelling throughout the school. Provide consistently effective challenge for the more able pupils to raise achievement. Ensure that all teachers strike the right balance between whole-class teaching and in providing opportunities for pupils to practise, apply and consolidate existing and newly learned skills, so that all pupils make good progress. Persuade the parents of those pupils who are frequently absent from school of the importance of sending their children to school regularly.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion