Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anne Taylor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Taylor

  • Postcode verified

    B5 5SU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings30w0
  • What needs to improve83w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
112
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Hopkins Principal South Birmingham College High Street Digbeth Birmingham B5 5SU

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 4 October 2010 to look at your provision for safeguarding students.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in safeguarding in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If South Birmingham College is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Features of good practice

 A well-embedded culture of ensuring that individual students are safeguarded along with promotion of a safe and healthy environment, both of which are endorsed at all levels of management and supported by all staff.  Placing students’ safety and their well-being at the heart of college policies and procedures.  Thorough planning to meet the needs of vulnerable groups, including pre- 16 learners, within an inclusive environment and supported by the development of strong partnerships and networks.  Extensive safeguarding training which ensures all staff understand their role in safeguarding individual students.  High awareness shown by students for their own safety alongside good understanding and appreciation of the actions that the college takes to keep them safe.  High expectations of students’ behaviour. Students are educated to develop independence and to make decisions which promote their own

p.1

Features of good practice

and others’ safety. Students behave well, feel safe and demonstrate safe working practices.  High levels of individual support for students. The tutorial curriculum is well developed and resourced. It focuses on developing individual students’ decision-making skills which are seen by the college as fundamental to safeguarding. Students are encouraged to discuss, debate, and reflect on the full range of ‘Every Child Matters’ outcomes.  Comprehensive health and safety and risk assessment processes along with a proactive approach to providing effective and supportive site security arrangements.  Extensive policies, procedures and educational resources in place to reduce the risks associated with using the internet.  Extensive and effective safeguarding procedures which are integral to the selection and recruitment of staff.

p.2

Areas for development:

 ensuring that all students are aware of safety-related enrichment activities, such as those that take place in ‘Freshers’ Week’.

p.2

Areas for development:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop safeguarding provision within the college.

p.2

Areas for development:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion