Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Miller

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen Miller

  • Postcode verified

    WN5 0LJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings31w0
  • What needs to improve75w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
105
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 81%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Peter McGhee Principal St John Rigby College Gathurst Road Orrell Wigan WN5 0LJ

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 2 November 2010 to look at your provision for safeguarding students.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in safeguarding in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If St John Rigby RC Sixth Form College is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Features of best practice

 The college provides a welcoming and supportive safe environment, which ensures that students have a strong feeling of safety within a close college community. They are clear that safety is a high priority of the college. Students understand that inappropriate behaviour, bullying or harassment are not tolerated and staff deal with any such incidents swiftly.  The college has a strong culture of promoting safeguarding, which is understood well by staff. Students’ safety is at the core of all that the college does. Promotion of safeguarding is central to the overall strategy of the college and is part of the self-assessment process. Training for staff and governors takes place frequently and case studies and role-play are used well to develop understanding. Senior managers are very knowledgeable about safeguarding.  The college uses its well-developed external links with specialist agencies very effectively to ensure students’ safety. Detailed risk assessments

p.1

Features of best practice

undertaken by the college are well informed by specialist agencies.  A strong focus is placed on promoting and developing safety awareness. Good use is made of discrete CCTV coverage of exposed and high risk areas. Students and staff have a good relationship with the student liaison officer who patrols the college to ensure site safety. Good links with the community police have helped provide information for learners on a wide range of topics, including safety while at college.  Comprehensive policies and procedures for safeguarding are in place. Policies are clear and reviewed and updated regularly. When tested, they have proved to be thorough and very effective in ensuring a safe environment. Strong and very effective links with the Local Safeguarding Children Board and other agencies help inform policy development.  The college is very effective in identifying early those students who are vulnerable or need support. Support plans are in place for students prior

p.1

Features of best practice

to starting at the college. Good links are in place with feeder schools which are used well to identify students’ wider needs. Students value the support they receive from their personal tutors. Good access exists to skilled counsellors, who are experienced at working with young people and providing a wide range of more specialist support.

p.2

Area for development

 Students value their tutorials in providing information on staying safe and making healthy life choices. However, they would like more opportunities to introduce their own topics into the tutorial programme.

p.2

Area for development

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop safeguarding provision in the college.

p.2

Area for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion