Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tony Gallagher
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 471
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ofsted 201 survey inspection programme: alternative provision
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 5 October 2010 look at your college’s use of alternative provision.
p.1
Ofsted 201 survey inspection programme: alternative provision
As outlined in my initial letter, the visit had a particular focus on evaluating the use of alternative provision for students who are vulnerable to underachieving and the impact this has on the outcomes for these students.
p.1
Ofsted 201 survey inspection programme: alternative provision
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 201 survey inspection programme: alternative provision
This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.
p.1
Outcomes
The alternative education programme engages some of the college’s most vulnerable students. They articulate well how it has improved their self- confidence, provided them with interesting and relevant learning opportunities and enabled them to settle better in mainstream subjects. The college has worked, generally to good effect, with alternative education providers to ensure that their courses increasingly operate at a level that matches students’ needs and predicted performance. Although college attainment is low when compared with national averages, results have improved over the last two years. Results have also improved for students taking the college’s ‘specialist programme’ which incorporates alternative provision. Case studies provided by the college demonstrate good student progression in relation to their education, behaviour, aspirations and attendance. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London
p.1
Outcomes
WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Outcomes
Ms Newsome Principal Babington Community Technology College Strasbourg Drive Beaumont Leys Leicester LE4 0SZ
p.1
Selecting and commissioning
The breadth of commissioned provision meets the needs and interests of those students interviewed. It spans vocational subjects, sport, childcare, and opportunities in dance or media. The college works with VESA, a city-wide and county-wide 13 19 collaboration, to develop education and training, in particular the ‘Future Pathways’ programme designed for students who have underachieved at Key Stage 3 and may be disengaged. This commissioning arrangement suits the needs of the college well. Beyond that, the college manages its commissioning arrangements in a forward-looking and constructive manner. Providers are well-briefed about individual students’ needs including an informative key stage report setting out effort grades, attendance, targets and a student self-assessment. Vital aspects of the alternative education programme such as insurance, safeguarding, risk assessment and the transfer of day-to-day information
p.2
Monitoring, evaluation and support
College managers have taken recent and effective action to improve monitoring, evaluation and support; alternative education has a clear and distinct role in college improvement. Case studies provided by the college illustrate well the challenging issues which some individual students face, for example in relation to language and communication. They also demonstrate how the college monitors students’ personal and academic progress. The city-wide collaborative learning manager (CLM) online system provides an instant record of attendance on courses wherever they are. This enables the college to act swiftly in the case of a student’s absence. CLM also acts as a collective record of vocational and academic progress. Behaviour issues and incidents are also recorded on this system. The college intervention mentor carries out weekly telephone checks with providers, periodic visits and termly progress report meetings.
p.2
Monitoring, evaluation and support
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop alternative provision in the college.
p.2
Monitoring, evaluation and support
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion