Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Seal

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Seal

  • Postcode verified

    GL12 7BD

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrengthsimprovedaccuratelyclearconsistent
Criticismnot alwaysweaknessesgapsnot accuratenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings456w−35
  • What needs to improve102w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
546
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Woolley Headteacher Blue Coat CofE Primary School Symn Lane Wotton-under-Edge Gloucestershire GL12 7BD

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 13 October 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; and discussions with senior leaders, other staff and pupils, and a representative from the local authority.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is satisfactory.

p.1

Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment

 APP has provided a framework for indentifying the strengths and weaknesses in pupils’ learning. Senior managers have recently improved the rigour and accuracy of assessment. This has revealed that some groups of pupils are underachieving, especially in writing.  Teachers’ use of APP is not accurate enough to provide reliable information. The pace of learning in Key Stage 1 and Years 3 and 4 has been slower than in Years 5 and 6. Pupils who are capable of attaining the higher levels in English and mathematics do not have long enough to make up lost ground. Consequently, although attainment overall is above average, progress is satisfactory.

p.1

Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress

 APP is beginning to help teachers to identify gaps in pupils’ learning and devise better classroom activities to support their progress.  APP has encouraged the school to begin to share pupils’ learning targets with parents to provide more detailed information about their children’s achievement.

p.2

support learning

 APP has enabled regular opportunities for moderation to take place. While considerably more work needs to be done, this is helping teachers to assess more accurately and develop their understanding of progression.  At the start of lessons, most teachers use success criteria to give pupils a clear idea of what they are aiming to achieve. However, these criteria are not always matched with learning activities that support pupils’ different needs.  Not all teachers take pupils’ capabilities and prior learning into account when planning lessons. As a result, pupils are not always given clear feedback about their next step in learning.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 APP has prompted the school to review pupils’ progress and attainment regularly. However, not all teachers use the information collected well to tailor the curriculum to the needs of individuals and groups of pupils.  Pupils’ writing is being assessed in subjects other than literacy, but a systematic approach has not been developed across the school.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring all teachers plan learning activities that meet pupils’ different needs and capabilities  providing pupils with feedback about their next step in learning in lessons  developing a consistent approach to assess writing across the curriculum.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion