Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Maureen York

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Maureen York

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovedpositiverigorousclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
490
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit to your pupil referral unit on 22 November 2010 to look at your use of alternative provision.

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

As outlined in my initial letter, the visit had a particular focus on examining the use of alternative provision for pupils who are vulnerable to underachieving, and the impact this has on the outcomes for these pupils .

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

survey inspection programme: alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Outcomes

 The unit uses alternative provision as part of an inclusive approach which seeks to re-engage pupils who are disaffected with all aspects of school.  Attendance at external courses is integrated with the individual learning programmes for each pupil and, as a result, of this joint approach the majority of pupils achieve some qualifications at the end of Year 11.  The majority of these pupils have improved both their attendance and their behaviour and those spoken to felt that they were learning important skills, including taking greater responsibility for their work and how to work effectively with others.  The pupils are positive about the difference that alternative educational provision has made and think that this is preparing them well for their future education, employment or training. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Outcomes

Ms P Ashworth Headteacher Francis Barber Pupil Referral Unit Franciscan Road Tooting London SW17 8HE

p.1

Selecting and commissioning

 The local authority provides a comprehensive evaluation framework which ensures that safeguarding requirements are met and that external provision is quality assured effectively.  The unit commissions providers to meet the individual needs of the pupils and it is rigorous in monitoring attendance and progress.  Before any placement is made, all providers are visited to ensure that they understand the needs of the pupils and are clear about the unit’s expectations.  Pupils are then closely involved before a final decision is made.

p.2

Monitoring, evaluation and support

 Attendance and behaviour are monitored over time and it is clear that there has been an overall improvement in both.  Key workers play an important role in maintaining the pupil in their placements and are often instrumental in ensuring that they attend regularly and on time.  Although the PRU evaluates the impact of alternative provision on outcomes for pupils the local authority is aware that more work is needed to ensure that this is the case for all schools in the borough. This work is underway. I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop alternative provision in the PRU.

p.2

Monitoring, evaluation and support

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion