Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Patricia Metham
- Postcode verified
NW8 0NH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. p.2
- As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.2
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.2
- Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 105
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs B Simpson Headteacher George Eliot Junior School Marlborough Hill London NW8 0NH
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visits on 5 July and 9 November 2010 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
The visits provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in English. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your school is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment before publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2010–11 best practice study: English
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: discussions with senior managers, teachers and pupils; observation of seven lessons; a review of departmental documents; and scrutiny of pupils’ work.
p.1
Features of good practice
Your strong and innovative curriculum management underpins continuity of approach and highly effective learning throughout the school. There is well-targeted support for pupils across a wide ability range, many of whom arrive with very limited knowledge of English language and culture. Lessons are planned in detail to ensure progression and to meet pupils’ individual needs. These plans are structured clearly, ensuring that pupils know what it is they are to learn and are led through a sequence of activities that is both accessible and challenging. Use of well chosen images and of stories told in part through pictures to develop pupils’ imagination and thinking skills is highly effective. Pupils are keen to explain how this approach not only engages their interest but also develops their ability to interpret information, to make inferences and to be imaginative in their own talking and writing. ‘The author wants you to
p.1
Features of good practice
infer through the pictures, to predict and think.’ ‘You have more fun. You look closely and see things you didn’t notice at first.’ A very discerning selection of texts and resources contributes hugely to the success of this ‘visual literacy’. Pupils also respond very productively to the opportunities to show initiative and take responsibility for aspects of their learning. This is well demonstrated in the school’s firmly structured programme of ‘reciprocal teaching’, in which pupils take responsibility for each other’s progress as readers as well as developing their own skills in a highly organised way. The process was summed up by one pupil as ‘giving and receiving’. Another commented: ‘Because we’re doing it ourselves, we’re in control. We get the responsibility.’ Their independent learning is, however, carefully monitored and supported by the class teacher. Other strengths of the teaching observed included: secure subject
p.2
Features of good practice
knowledge; enterprising use of technology; excellent questioning skills; a very good rapport between teachers and pupils; and some excellent practice in differentiation. Close monitoring of teaching and learning shapes the school’s enterprising and well-targeted programme of professional development. The positive impact of the curriculum and of approaches to teaching and learning can be seen in the outstanding progress made by pupils. From what is in many instances a very low starting point, pupils’ attainment at the end of Year 6 is well above average. The results for 2010 show over 93% gaining Level 4 and 45% gaining Level 5. This represents outstanding achievement. Girls, on the whole, make better progress than boys.
p.2
An area for development, which we discussed, is:
extending and reinforcing strategies to close the achievement gap between boys and girls.
p.2
An area for development, which we discussed, is:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.
p.2
An area for development, which we discussed, is:
As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion