Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tony Noonan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tony Noonan

  • Postcode verified

    LU2 7EW

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings34w0
  • What needs to improve76w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
109
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 76%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr S Kitchener Principal Luton Sixth Form College Bradgers Hill Road Luton LU2 7EW Dear Mr Kitchener

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and learners, during my visit on 4 November 2010 to look at work in securing and developing best value for money.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in value for money in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If your college is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: value for money in colleges

The evidence used to inform the judgements included scrutiny of documentation and meetings with senior managers and learners.

p.1

Features of best practice

 Learners’ outcomes are good overall, and outstanding for many subjects, and the progress of learners relative to their prior qualifications and experience is very good.  The college’s curriculum is reviewed regularly and includes evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of programmes. Detailed course-costing procedures are carried out, for example when considering whether to continue to run the International Baccalaureate course. Decisive management actions are taken to improve value for money, while ensuring that the college’s values and equity issues are met.  The college serves an ethnically diverse area and its inclusive admissions policy, with lower than average GCSE entry scores for all courses, helps to widen participation to learners from socially and economically disadvantaged backgrounds.  Strong collaboration with other sixth form colleges through the CENBASE partnership enables successful and relevant staff training and the sharing

p.1

Features of best practice

of good practice to take place in a cost-effective manner.  The resources are managed very well, enabling more effective use of college facilities and providing better value for money. For example, extending the length of the college day has made better use of accommodation, including students’ social space, and allowed more efficient utilisation of staff teaching time.  A major capital project was managed carefully and the move to a new campus took place within budget and on schedule.  Excellent financial management has enabled continued investment in resources to support students, while achieving efficiency gains to balance college budgets.

p.2

Area for development

 Take the opportunity to develop more innovative and cost-effective methods of teaching and learning, using the new accommodation and resources now available to staff and students.

p.2

Area for development

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop your approaches to securing value for money in your college.

p.2

Area for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion