Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jane Millward
- Postcode verified
BB7 1ED
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has improved systems to identify particular groups of vulnerable learners who were not achieving as they might and has introduced timely interventions to secure a better rate of progress. p.1
- The work of the local authority consultants and advisers has been very well received. p.2
- Increase the proportion of good lessons where the quality of teaching and learning enables pupils to make rapid progress. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 834
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Paul Adnitt Headteacher St James’ Church of England Primary School Greenacre Street Clitheroe Lancashire BB7 1ED
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 17 November 2010, for the time you gave to our phone discussions and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass on my thanks to the pupils who gave up some of their lunchtime to talk with me and to the Chair of Governors and staff for their time and courtesy. Since the last inspection there has been a rise in the numbers of pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals. The number on roll has declined resulting in a reduction in the number of classes from nine to eight.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
As a result of the inspection on 8 and 9 December 2008, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school has made satisfactory progress in making improvements and satisfactory progress in demonstrating a better capacity for sustained improvement.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Pupils’ attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 in 2010 represents an increase compared to the previous five years. The improving trend indicates children are achieving broadly average national expectations. The school has improved systems to identify particular groups of vulnerable learners who were not achieving as they might and has introduced timely interventions to secure a better rate of progress. Through effective action planning the school prioritised improving writing and gains can be seen in pupils’ attainment levels and the progress they now make.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Attainment in 2010 at the end of Key Stage 1 is disappointing and shows a decline in all subjects. Pupils’ attainment is below national expectations in reading, writing and Suite 22 West Lancashire Investment Centre Maple View White Moss Business Park Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com September 2010 Page 2 mathematics. The school’s current data indicate that better progress has been secured through improved provision, although further improvement is required. This is most noticeable for the higher ability pupils. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities generally make at least the progress expected of them due to the effective support they receive. At the last inspection, the school was asked to improve achievement in writing and gains are now evident in both attainment and
p.1
Church of England Primary School
There is a clear and sharply-focused drive to improve the quality of pupils’ learning by developing teachers’ skills and awareness of best practice. As a result, the consistency of teaching is improving. There has been a focus on teaching and learning throughout the school and targeted support by the local authority has resulted in better rates of progress by pupils in English and mathematics. In the better lessons pupils make good progress and work is matched to the needs of all learners. There is good pace and challenge and clear expectations lead to good provision and outcomes. Pupils are aware of their targets and know what they need to do to improve. In the less-effective lessons the higher ability pupils are not sufficiently challenged. Marking of pupils’ work affirms the efforts of pupils and in the best examples they are guided on how to improve their work. Teachers are involved in the setting of academic targets for pupils and meetings with the
p.2
Church of England Primary School
headteacher ensure progress is monitored. Where pupils’ progress falls short, intervention plans are quickly put into place.
p.2
Church of England Primary School
Improved systems and procedures are in place to track individuals and groups of pupils. The school leaders have a better understanding of pupils who are underachieving and have clear structures in place to address identified weaknesses. Systems for monitoring include a cycle of moderation, pupil progress meetings, lesson observations, planning and book scrutiny as well as an evaluation of pupils’ views. Whilst these processes are in place, the school has yet to evaluate, embed and sustain the resulting developments made. Members of the governing body are now better at holding the school to account. The Chair of Governors is aware of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and provides effective support and challenge. Committees have been developed to ensure governor skills are fully utilised.
p.2
Church of England Primary School
Support from the local authority since the last inspection has involved working closely with teaching staff on improving provision. The work of the local authority consultants and advisers has been very well received.
p.2
Church of England Primary School
I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.
p.2
place in December 2008
Improve pupils’ achievement, particularly in writing and in Years 3 to 6. Increase the proportion of good lessons where the quality of teaching and learning enables pupils to make rapid progress. Ensure that the action leaders take to tackle underachievement is more focused and rigorous.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion