Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nell Banfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nell Banfield

  • Postcode verified

    HX7 5QN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−29Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfulstrengthsclearclearly
Criticismweaknessesinconsistentgapsnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings460w−29
  • What needs to improve84w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
532
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 15%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs C Spillane Headteacher Calder High School, A Specialist Technology College Brier Hey Lane Mytholmroyd Hebden Bridge HX7 5QN Dear Mrs Spillane

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 28 September 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; and discussions with senior leaders, other staff and students, and with a representative from the local authority.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is satisfactory.

p.1

Impact on students’ achievement and attainment

 Teachers’ increasing accuracy of assessments and their developing understanding of progression are helping to improve the attainment of the majority of students. Although most are making better progress, some groups’ progress is slower.  APP is contributing to rigour in target-setting. Although students are more aware of short-term targets and how these lead to longer-term success and progress, not all have individualised subject-specific targets.

p.1

Impact on the quality of students’ learning and progress

 APP criteria are used with increasing confidence to identify gaps in students’ learning so that interventions and learning opportunities can be tailored to their needs.  APP is helping to improve teacher’s understanding of progression. Consequently, they are more able to clarify the component skills and understanding that add up to successful learning for students.  As a result of using APP, teachers are focusing increasingly on students’ ability to evaluate their own and each other’s work. Students have good access to clear success criteria in lessons to help them assess the quality of their work and strive to reach the next stage of learning.

p.2

support learning

 Teachers are gaining expertise in using assessment information to plan learning that builds on students’ capabilities and understanding. However, this is not yet accelerating the progress of all students because practice is inconsistent.  Teachers’ marking indicates clearly what students need to do to improve. APP is increasing the precision of teachers’ written comments and evidently most students are responding to this clearer guidance.  APP has instigated valuable professional dialogue within subjects. However, a shared language for assessment to support cross-phase and cross-subject discussion of students’ learning is not in place yet.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 A developing understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in students’ learning is helping teachers to tailor the curriculum and increase students’ engagement with learning.  APP is helping teachers to map assessment opportunities across curriculum areas and embed them in teaching and learning.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 planning lessons that build on students’ prior learning systematically  using assessment information to set all students subject-specific targets.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion