Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Mar 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Austin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Austin

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+26Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery effectiverobusthigh expectationsimprovingwell-ledenthusiasticpositive
Criticisminadequatevariableslownot successfulnot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings44w0
  • What needs to improve1056w+26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,095
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 96%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566934 Direct F 01695 729320 gtunnicliffe@cfbt.com www.cfbt-inspections.com

p.1

Mrs K Barton Headteacher Up Holland High School Sandbrook Road Orrell Wigan Lancashire WN5 7AL

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I inspected your school on 16 February 2011 and for the information which you provided before and during the inspection. Please pass my thanks on to the Chair of the Governing Body, the representative of the local authority and the Junior Leadership Team who all gave up their time to talk to me about the school’s progress.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

As a result of the inspection in May 2010, the school was asked to address the most important areas for improvement which are set out in the annex to this letter. Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the students' achievement.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

GCSE results in 2010 showed little improvement on those of 2009. Attainment was broadly average and students’ achievement was inadequate overall. The school has implemented a broad range of strategies to improve achievement. A new, accessible, robust system for tracking students’ progress towards their challenging targets has been established and is pivotal in this drive. Staff are able to identify students who are underachieving and take steps to improve their progress. Students and their parents and carers receive clearer information, more frequently, about rates of progress so that they are better placed to work in partnership with the school. The school’s data show that it expects to meet its target for the proportion of students gaining at least five good GCSE passes, including English and mathematics, this summer. However, although the school’s performance is improving against other measures, it does not expect to reach all its targets.

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

Shortfalls in performance in the school’s specialist areas of mathematics and music were identified at the time of the previous inspection. The new leader in mathematics has rapidly introduced a range of initiatives to improve provision and accelerate students’ progress, particularly by making learning fun and relevant. There is a sharp, but far from exclusive, focus on improving outcomes for Year 11. Early entry for a GCSE has proved helpful in January 2011

p.1

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

Page2 increasing students’ confidence and providing a firm basis for targeted teaching and support to improve their final grades. Through links with a local college, specialised provision is being made for the most able. Students are enthusiastic about the ‘Maths Academy’ provided weekly after school and attend in large numbers. Staff are benefiting from the expertise of a number of local schools with outstanding practice in mathematics. Based on the school’s data, a marked rise in good GCSE passes, including those at the highest grades, is expected this year. Developments in music are less secure.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

A concerted and well-led drive to raise the quality of teaching is paying dividends. Both the school’s monitoring and that of the local authority show that there has been a significant improvement in the proportion of lessons which are at least good. The drive and professionalism of the critical difference team in seeking improvement through, for example, leading training sessions and sharing advice, has had a significant impact on the determination of staff to extend their classroom repertoire. The synergy between the work of this group and that of senior leaders in introducing coaching, reflective practice, joint observations and the filming of lessons, has accelerated the pace of improvement. Nevertheless, some inadequate practice remains.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

Common features of the lessons observed during this inspection were: good relationships between students and between adults and students; positive attitudes to learning; disciplined listening; and prompt attention to instructions. Characteristics of the better lessons were: high expectations; a brisk pace; challenging activities; effective use of praise; well-targeted questioning; and opportunities for students to learn independently. Where lessons were less successful, work was not well enough planned to meet the differing abilities of the students. The pace was slow and questions did not explore the depth of students’ understanding. The quality of marking and feedback to students is very variable. The school has some good practice on which to build and recognises that more work is needed to establish a consistent approach in this area.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

The headteacher is providing a forthright and open lead to the school’s improvement. Expectations are high and there is a suitably robust approach to underperformance. Leaders at all levels are now better placed to discharge their responsibilities. Senior leaders have clear remits and lines of accountability are in place. Middle leaders know what is expected of them and there has been a range of well-received training to support them in fulfilling their roles. Through more systematic approaches to the analysis of data, action planning, monitoring, and evaluation, middle leaders are making a much more pertinent, though still variable, contribution to the school’s improvement. The school is making very effective use of a wide range of partnerships with outstanding providers to extend the experience, understanding and expertise of staff across an array of areas.

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

The local authority’s statement of action and action plan are fit for purpose. The headteacher has welcomed the well-judged support provided by the local authority adviser and the School Improvement Partner. This has been well matched to the school’s needs and is reducing markedly as improvements embed. January 2011

p.2

Notice to improve: monitoring inspection of Up Holland High School

Page3 I hope that you have found the inspection helpful in promoting improvement in your school. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.3

20-21 May 2010

 Raise achievement so that the outcomes are at least commensurate with students’ capabilities especially: - in mathematics and music - for more-able students so that more high grades are attained.

p.4

20-21 May 2010

 Improve the quality of teaching so that more of it is good or better by: - raising expectations - increasing the pace of lessons - ensuring that teaching and the work set are well matched with the different abilities of students so that they can achieve their potential - ensuring that students are actively involved in their own learning - improving the guidance given to students on how to improve their work and achieve higher levels and grades.

p.4

20-21 May 2010

 Develop leadership and management skills at senior and middle leadership level by: - ensuring that there are clear responsibilities for the management of strategies to raise achievement including strategies to improve the quality of teaching and learning - involving leaders fully in self-evaluation and in driving improvements in their areas of responsibility.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion