Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Feb 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Margaret Dickinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Dickinson

  • Postcode verified

    TA10 0HD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−6Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoystrongsuccessfullyenjoymentimproving
Criticismlimitedshortcomingsnot yetvariationnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings592w+14
  • Leadership161w−45
  • What needs to improve129w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
865
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs A Russell Headteacher Curry Rivel CofE Primary School Church Street Curry Rivel TA10 0HD

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: music

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 17 November 2010 to look at work in music.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: music

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: music

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, in your role of headteacher and music coordinator, and with pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four class lessons and two instrumental lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: music

The overall effectiveness of music is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in music

Achievement in music is broadly satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in music

 Attainment is average by the end of Year 6, representing satisfactory progress. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage enjoy exploring sounds on a variety of instruments. They respond enthusiastically to the teacher’s instructions and develop an awareness of ways that sounds can be organised. In Years 1 to 4, pupils’ ability to structure their musical ideas develops satisfactorily. This was demonstrated by pupils in Year 4 using their voices and a range of techniques on the Taiko drums to devise rhythmic compositions. However, progress is slower in upper Key Stage 2 because pupils have fewer opportunities to create and develop musical ideas.  Participation in instrumental tuition is satisfactory overall. New arrangements for instrumental tuition were introduced this year, in conjunction with the local partnership cluster of schools. Provision is now through a commercial company which replaced the local authority Wider

p.1

Achievement in music

Opportunities initiative. Numbers participating have reduced because pupils’ involvement is now reliant on parental choice and willingness to pay. The early signs are that pupils enjoy their new instrumental lessons and appreciate the broader choice of instruments that they can choose to learn. However, few pupils are involved in extra-curricular activities because opportunities are very limited.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

The quality of teaching in music is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

 Most lessons involve practical activities that are focused appropriately on the development of skills and musical knowledge. For example, in the Reception and Year 1 lesson seen, pupils were encouraged to explore sounds and make musical decisions. This helped them to develop skills in listening and responding and enabled them to make creative responses. Similarly, in a Year 4 lesson, all pupils were actively involved practising skills and techniques that had been learnt in previous lessons before using these, and their voices, successfully to create a short improvisation.  There is some variation in quality of instrumental teaching. In a guitar lesson, for example, pupils had little opportunity to play the guitar because the teacher spent a lot of the time talking and explaining. This limited the extent to which the lesson was a musical experience. In contrast, a pupil played for a substantial proportion of a piano lesson. The teacher ensured

p.2

Quality of teaching in music

careful attention to detail through a variety of well-chosen tasks, which resulted in much more musical outcome and better progress.  Pupils enjoy using computers to create their own ideas but the tasks are sometimes too open-ended so that pupils become confused and do not produce a musically satisfying outcome.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

The quality of the curriculum in music is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in music

 Pupils have opportunities to sing in lessons and assemblies and to perform to an audience and participate in larger-scale events.  The curriculum plans for music are stronger in Years 1 to 4 than they are in upper Key Stage 2. Although older pupils listen regularly and respond to a range of music, they have more limited opportunities to perform on classroom instruments and to create their own ideas. The school’s longer- term plan for music does not show as clearly how these particular aspects of the curriculum will be promoted.  The school is benefiting from a strong partnership with the local cluster of schools which is enabling pupils to borrow instruments and to access a broader range of instrumental tuition than that available in the previous year, through the Wider Opportunities initiative.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

The effectiveness of the leadership and management in music is satisfactory.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in music

 Appropriate emphasis is placed on pupils enjoying and benefiting from music. The school responded to the shortcomings identified in the quality of the instrumental tuition last year and to the critical feedback from the pupils. The early signs are that the new arrangements are bringing about greater enjoyment for pupils although they have not yet led to increased participation.  You report, rightly, that much of the evaluation of curriculum music has been based upon informal observations and recognise, correctly, that improving the breadth and depth of the curriculum in Key Stage 2 has had less attention.  As music coordinator, you are aware of some of the national initiatives in music, such as Sing Up, and you have introduced some of the published resources into school to broaden the singing repertoire. This has not yet, however, led to singing standards being better than broadly in line with expectations.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 providing more regular opportunities for pupils in upper Key Stage 2 to create and develop musical ideas  reviewing the curriculum plans for music to support clearer progression in musical skills and knowledge across all strands of the subject, particularly in upper Key Stage 2  building on the new instrumental teaching programme to increase participation in instrumental lessons and a greater range of extra- curricular activities.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop music in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website under the unique reference number for your school. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion