Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jan 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Cragg

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Cragg

  • Postcode verified

    IP9 2NA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentvery effectiveenjoyeffectivelyhigh expectationsgood progressclear
Criticismnot yetvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings606w+84
  • Leadership132w+84
  • What needs to improve78w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
800
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr J Lynch Headteacher Tattingstone Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Church Road Tattingstone Ipswich Suffolk IP9 2NA

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 30 November 2010 to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of four part-lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: English

The overall effectiveness of English is outstanding.

p.1

Achievement in English

 Pupils join the school with knowledge, understanding and skills which are broadly in line with those found nationally. Pupils’ attainment by the end of Year 6 is consistently high. In 2010, provisional results indicate that all pupils achieved Level 4 and nearly two thirds achieved Level 5, which is well above the average nationally.  Performance in reading is stronger than in writing but is no greater than the gap nationally. The variation between reading and writing is more marked at the end of Year 2.  Pupils make outstanding progress from their starting points. Boys make particularly impressive progress as do pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities.  In lessons, pupils make very good progress. They enjoy English and show excellent attitudes to learning. They make the most of opportunities to discuss their work and are eager to share their ideas. For example, all the pupils in one class volunteered to report back after talking in pairs about

p.1

Achievement in English

the emotions of a character. In all classes, pupils settle to work promptly, understand what to do and often support their own learning by using their targets or criteria for success to improve their work. Older pupils make relevant and helpful comments about the work of others.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

The quality of teaching in English is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

 Teachers use their excellent subject knowledge to plan lessons with very clear objectives and challenging criteria for success. They set high expectations for pupils, emphasising key skills linked to pupils’ individual targets. Pupils respond very positively to the challenge and produce high- quality work.  Teachers engage pupils’ interest through a very good range of activities which includes exciting reading of texts, drama techniques and regular discussion. For example, pupils were encouraged to imagine themselves listening to a storyteller around a camp fire before retelling an incident from ‘Beowulf’.  Teachers use questions very effectively to extend pupils’ thinking and to challenge them to explain and justify their ideas. Marking is detailed and offers useful suggestions to pupils on how to improve their work. Older pupils regularly comment on each other’s work, using specific criteria, and

p.2

Quality of teaching in English

say that this helps them to see how to improve their own work.  In the Early Years Foundation Stage, the teaching of phonics is precise and linked very effectively into writing tasks so that children successfully apply their understanding in building words and sentences.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

The quality of the curriculum in English is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 The curriculum covers a full range of texts and genres, including poetry, non-fiction and drama. Whole texts are used effectively to engage pupils’ interest and to stimulate a range of writing. Pupils use speaking and listening skills regularly to enhance their learning and enjoy drama activities such as ‘freeze framing’ aspects of a story to help plan a narrative.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in English

 Increasingly, pupils are challenged to apply their literacy skills in other subjects or topics but this is not yet regular enough to test their ability to select correct approaches and adjust their skills to fit a particular purpose. There are very effective connections in creative work, such as linking art with writing poetry.  There are good opportunities for enrichment in English through the writing club, competitions and theatre trips. Pupils say that they enjoy English, especially the opportunities to write creatively. However, they do not use computers in English regularly, for example to review different media or modern forms of communication.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

Leadership and management in English are outstanding.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in English

 You have a very clear vision for English founded on promoting pupils’ enjoyment and setting very high expectations. There is a very accurate understanding of strengths in the subject and areas for further development. Priorities for improvement are clear and well focused.  Teachers work well together and share a commitment to high standards. They benefit from very effective training and exchange good practice.  Teachers assess pupils’ progress regularly and review their targets. You track teaching and provision rigorously. There is no complacency in the school and staff set constantly challenging targets.  The school has maintained high achievement over several years and has made improvements in areas such as the Early Years Foundation Stage. There is very good capacity to improve further.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 developing more opportunities for pupils to apply their literacy skills through topics and other subjects.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion