Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jan 2011

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Champak Chauhan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Champak Chauhan

  • Postcode verified

    S45 8EU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisemake good progressexcellentenjoystrengthsenjoymentkeenclear
Criticismweaknessesyet tolimitedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings634w+75
  • Leadership174w−48
  • What needs to improve95w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
877
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 17%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr N Snape Headteacher Pilsley Primary School Station Road Pilsley Chesterfield S45 8EU

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: history

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 25 November 2010 to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: history

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, staff and pupils; a scrutiny of relevant documentation; an analysis of pupils’ work; and the observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 subject survey inspection programme: history

The overall effectiveness of history is good.

p.1

Achievement in history

 From relatively low starting points, pupils make good progress and attain standards that are broadly in line with the expectations for their ages.  Pupils are developing their chronological understanding well. They understand changes over a broad expanse of time. Their sense of period is strengthened by, for example, learning about aspects of local history.  Pupils are developing their historical skills well. They can use a wide range of evidence and can ask relevant questions about it. As they get older, their skills of enquiry develop better.  Pupils can communicate well about the past and many write well for their ages. The higher attainers can write extensively, and for different audiences and purposes. Pupils’ skills in information and communication technology are well developed. Those in Year 6, for example, can construct good electronic presentations about the lives of famous people.  Pupils’ quality of learning is good and they enjoy studying the subject.

p.1

Achievement in history

Their attitudes and behaviour are excellent. They work for sustained periods, and work well with each other and with the adults.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

The quality of teaching in history is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

 Teachers create a good learning environment in lessons based on good relationships.  Lessons are planned in detail and the needs of the various abilities are taken into account. Teachers question pupils well who respond enthusiastically. They are keen to answer questions in whole-class discussions.  The interactive whiteboard is used well. Teachers use it to stimulate pupils’ thinking and websites are located on it for further in-depth work as a class.  Pupils work well in small groups and enjoy the tasks set. They make good progress because the tasks are open-ended and involve investigative work with different types of evidence.  The pace to the learning is brisk. Time is used well and explicit timescales, which have been identified for particular activities, are adhered to.  Teachers offer detailed and regular oral feedback to the pupils. This supports the detailed marking in pupils’ books. Targets for improvement

p.2

Quality of teaching in history

are set routinely and pupils value these and the teachers’ comments. They say it helps them to improve their work.  Pupils’ progress across the school is monitored closely. The school has developed baseline assessments in Year 1 and end-of-unit assessments in all year groups which identify pupils’ strengths and weaknesses in the subject. The information is tracked and trends quickly identified. Appropriate action is taken, as needed, to intervene with particular pupils.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

The quality of the curriculum in history is good.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

 The curriculum is broad and balanced, and it meets requirements. It is coherent and offers pupils a good experience of history through cross- curricular approaches. There is a good emphasis on developing pupils’ literacy skills through the study of history.  Planning for progression is good, especially for the development of skills. These are incorporated well into the assessment procedures.  Work on local history is being expanded well. Pupils regularly study aspects of life in Pilsley in the past and learn, for example, about the changing use of buildings over time.  Pupils are offered a good range of enrichment experiences. They regularly visit places of historical interest, for instance Hardwick Hall and Chesterfield Museum. Some valuable research work on paintings at Chatsworth House has been undertaken by the gifted and talented pupils. They share their experiences with other pupils in the school. Visitors are

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in history

invited regularly into school to talk to pupils about aspects of local history.  The range of experiences offered to pupils contributes well to their enjoyment of the subject. The open-ended tasks which are often planned enhance their creative skills.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

The effectiveness of the leadership and management in history is good.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

 The subject leader has been in post for only a few weeks and has some good ideas on how to further develop the subject. As the previous subject leader, you are helping her well to settle down in this role.  You and the subject leader lead the subject well. There is a clear sense of purpose and direction. Staff have been given good advice and guidance.  There is a thorough understanding of strengths and weaknesses in the subject through thorough self-evaluation. This includes careful scrutiny of planning, a scrutiny of pupils’ work and the use of end-of-unit assessments to track pupils’ progress across the school. The views of pupils are also taken into account. Weaknesses are identified and addressed.  Although, as the previous subject leader you have observed lessons, the current subject leader has not. She has yet to develop the full range of monitoring and evaluation responsibilities across the school. Staff

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management in history

development in recent years has been limited.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that the subject leader is helped and supported to undertake the full range of monitoring and evaluation activities within the school  ensuring that staff training in history is regularly undertaken.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion