Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Harrison

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Harrison

  • Postcode verified

    LA2 6AP

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve58w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
85
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 9%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 71%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr G Pyle Principal Beaumont College Slyne Road Lancaster LA2 6AP

p.1

Ofsted best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 12 October 2010 to look at your provision for safeguarding students.

p.1

Ofsted best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in safeguarding in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If Beaumont College is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment on the text prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Features of good practice

 excellent staff training that is delivered in an engaging and interactive manner that ensures staff have a detailed and thorough understanding of safeguarding procedures and confidence to implement them  a culture of openness which places a high value on input from all staff, underpinned by strong strategic leadership on safeguarding and exemplary policies and procedures  imaginative deployment of staff specialisms to meet the safeguarding needs of individual students, which supports the culture of early identification of potential issues well  very effective communication between staff about vulnerable learners and excellent liaison with external agencies, in particular the health service  very good support from the parent company, a national charity, which has in place its own well-established safeguarding unit.

p.1

Area for development

 Continue to refine risk assessment processes to promote learners’ independence further.

p.2

Area for development

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop safeguarding provision in the college.

p.2

Area for development

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the inspection team for your next college inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion