Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philippa Francis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philippa Francis

  • Postcode verified

    WF1 2DH

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
30
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%About the inspection 94%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 Textphone 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs S Griffiths Principal Wakefield College Wakefield Campus Margaret Street Wakefield WF1 2DH

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 11 November 2010 to look at your provision for safeguarding students.

p.1

Ofsted 2010 11 best practice survey: safeguarding in colleges

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our publication about best practice in safeguarding in colleges. The publication will include case studies about individual providers. If Wakefield College is included as a case study, you will have an opportunity to comment prior to publication. Individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Features of best practice

 High priority is given to safeguarding across the college, led strongly by you and thoroughly supported by the governors. The highly effective safeguarding committee, chaired by the principal, has a clear remit and action plan to promote safeguarding. Self-assessment of safeguarding provision is thorough.  A rigorous recruitment and selection policy ensures that vetting checks on all staff are carried out thoroughly and recorded accurately. The comprehensive single central record is linked effectively to other management systems including safeguarding training records. Good support is given to different groups to undertake vetting checks, such as students on early years courses prior to going on work placements and ‘young volunteers’.  The provision of thorough training in safeguarding at all levels and across the college is flexible and tailored to meet the specific needs of different groups of staff. This includes providing training at different times of the

p.1

Features of best practice

day to fit in with staff working hours and a flexible approach to delivering training according to individual learning styles.  The tutorial scheme and other education initiatives are used very well to ensure that young people have good knowledge and a high awareness of ways in which they can keep themselves safe. Tutorial topics are differentiated by level and are relevant and helpful in covering areas, such as dates and socialising, use of minicabs and dealing with bogus callers. E- safety is strongly promoted including advice on cyber-bullying and a new facility on all computers to report concerns directly about bullying to a senior manager.  A robust approach is in place for site security through the use of carefully trained security guards, vigilance by all with regard to the identity of people moving around all college sites including ensuring that all staff display and all students carry photo identity cards.

p.2

Features of best practice

 High priority is given to health and safety. Contractors complete a comprehensive ‘permit to work’ before embarking on work on college sites. Risk assessments are updated annually and are held centrally in an electronic database as well as in each subject department. The use of control measures, including personal protective equipment is reinforced strongly. The causes of accidents and near misses are analysed carefully and actions taken promptly to redress any concerns.

p.2

Features of best practice

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop safeguarding provision in the college.

p.2

Features of best practice

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next college inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion